tst-oddstacklimit.out] Error 139

2005-05-04 Thread Peter Ennis
Anyone seen this or similar? Should I ignore and continue? Running FC4T1 host Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20050428 binutils-2.16.90.0.2 5.7. Glibc-2.3.5 Google did not help Test fails as follows: GCONV_PATH=/home/lfs/glibc-build/iconvdata LC_ALL=C ; ulimit -s 1023; /home/lfs/glibc-build/elf

Re: bootscripts

2005-05-04 Thread DJ Lucas
Dennis J Perkins wrote: Hi, didn't have time ATM to dig into the others, but for the network scripts: > > Ifup seems a bit complicated. Why have files in > a /etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.eth0 directory instead of > putting settings in a single file > called /etc/sysconfig/network-devi

bootscripts

2005-05-04 Thread Dennis J Perkins
I've been reading the bootscripts. They are well written. I do have a few comments, however. In the rc script, I think line 53 should say, ...can't be stopped in runlevel..." instead of "...can't be started in runlevel..." In rc, why not say previous=${PREVLEVEL:-N} inste

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Ryan . Oliver
> Just to say im not sure where your going but i hope to > have each compilier stored away for emulation, could be handy for lfs > users, Each compiler? Just do a multilib build, you only need one... Will release a new cross-lfs within the next 2 days or so, looks good so far for bi-arch x86

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Thomas Pegg
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > > Well it sounds like we'll have a good number of testers for the x86_64 > arch then :) > You can add me to the list of x86_64 testers. :) -- Thomas LFS User : 4729 / Linux User : 298329 kitt - Powered by: Linux 2.6.9-1.667 08:22:44 up 3 days, 22:05, 2 users, loa

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
jamie bennett wrote: Another x86_64'er here. Jeremy, are you using Ryan's scripts for your x86_64 builds or do you have your own x86_64 specific one? I ask as I'm going to enbark on a build tonight and wondered whether to use Ryan's or hack one up from the book. Well, Ryan's scripts are the author

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread jamie bennett
Quoting Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well it sounds like we'll have a good number of testers for the x86_64 > arch then :) Another x86_64'er here. Jeremy, are you using Ryan's scripts for your x86_64 builds or do you have your own x86_64 specific one? I ask as I'm going to enbark on a b

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Marty _ wrote: I dont mean to get on your toes or anything, but im doing the same thing. (result of endless tries of trying to get a stable amd64 and i686 compiles going symataniously with gcc in a secure enviroment) Im either almost finished or nowhere near, im still debugging right now. (208

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread John Miller
Jeremy Utley wrote: john wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: My intention in making this (nowhere near finished!) rendered version of the book available is so that it will answer a few questions about what cross-lfs is and aims to be, making it possible for more to get involved or interested in the bo

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Marty _
I dont mean to get on your toes or anything, but im doing the same thing. (result of endless tries of trying to get a stable amd64 and i686 compiles going symataniously with gcc in a secure enviroment) Im either almost finished or nowhere near, im still debugging right now. (208 installs of gli

Re: news for newbies?

2005-05-04 Thread Marty _
the only problem i can see there is you havent loaded your kernel, but i suppose since kexec has been released (change kernel without rebooting, wow just what ive been waiting for! full 32 emulation mode here i come!) I suppose you could. But thatll make lfs too complicated for the new user. In