Re: relocation of the sources

2005-06-07 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 6/7/05, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > from > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html > -snip- > > The packages and patches stored in /sources can also be moved to a > more usual location, such as /usr/src/packages. The entire directory can >

Re: relocation of the sources

2005-06-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Archaic wrote these words on 06/07/05 23:55 CST: > Basically rewording nearly an entire page due to the fact that it is > both hand-holding and confusing at the same time. The reason I call it > hand-holding is that even a *suggestion* in the book (without any other > counter-suggestions) will lea

Re: relocation of the sources

2005-06-07 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Is there any way you can perhaps make a short paragraph of what > you are suggesting? I read your original email earlier today, but > it was simply too much to think about. I got lost. Basically rewording nearly an entire page du

Re: relocation of the sources

2005-06-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Archaic wrote these words on 06/07/05 23:30 CST: > Suggestions? Comments? Feedback is requested, please. Is there any way you can perhaps make a short paragraph of what you are suggesting? I read your original email earlier today, but it was simply too much to think about. I got lost. So, I just

Re: relocation of the sources

2005-06-07 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:08:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My suggestion is to leave that part completely out of chapter 6 and put > it in as an appendix to the book. It is extremely confusing after you > do that and then go to chapter 7. Did you read my changes? If so please re-repl

Re: relocation of the sources

2005-06-07 Thread M.Canales.es
El Martes, 7 de Junio de 2005 19:56, Archaic escribió: > from > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.ht >ml The redaction changes look fine to me. > > This brought up a philosophical debate in my mind. If the book mentions > moving the sources, but then proceed

relocation of the sources

2005-06-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 12:56, Archaic wrote: > from > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html > > # > From now on, when reentering the chroot environment after exiting, use > the following modified chroot command: > > chroot "$LFS" /usr/bin/env -i

relocation of the sources

2005-06-07 Thread Archaic
from http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html # From now on, when reentering the chroot environment after exiting, use the following modified chroot command: chroot "$LFS" /usr/bin/env -i \ HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \ PATH=/bi

Slashdot/IBM LFS Article

2005-06-07 Thread Michael Kipper
Seeing as noone else has posted this to lfs-dev, I will: Slashdot is carrying a link to an IBM article about LFS from May 24th. The IBM article can be found at: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/os-lfs/?ca=dgr-lnxw01BuildLinux The slashdot post can be found at: http://linux.slas

Re: Duplicate drivers and hotplug, aka "Live CD doesn't detect RTL-8139"

2005-06-07 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: a) drop 8139cp (in preference to 8139too), eepro100 (in preference to e100), dmfe (in preference to tulip), xircom_tulip_cb (in preference to xircom_cb, and it doesn't load anyway because of missing symbols). If you disagree because this breaks your network access