Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
So, I know there's competitive offers like this out there. (Justin
Knierim seems to be able to sniff out good deals, :) ) Is another $60 US
per month a burden for you, Gerard? Perhaps. Only you could say.
However, we have, I believe, at least 15 active members in the comm
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:00 -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Richard, I could host those temporialy for you
Easy solution, put them on one of our /~home dir's. There are alot of us
willing to help.
-- Jamie
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfr
Richard A Downing FBCS CITP wrote:
Well, the time has finally come to move house. I've been threatening to
do it since February, but the realors, lawyers and bankers have finally
got their act together and the men with the big truck will be here on
Monday (my computers will go in my car, though
Well, the time has finally come to move house. I've been threatening to
do it since February, but the realors, lawyers and bankers have finally
got their act together and the men with the big truck will be here on
Monday (my computers will go in my car, though).
I have not been able to arrange a
Jim Gifford wrote:
> Nathan Coulson wrote:
>
>> On 7/2/05, Nathan Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The functions file is getting overly complicated for these 2 simple
>>> tasks, taking a few variables and many lines of code.
>>>
>>> (Also, I am going to be reviewing a few more trou
On July 2, 2005 12:20 pm, Zachary Kotlarek wrote:
> Heck, I'm not even an active member and I'd be happy to come up with
> $5/month to help defray hosting costs. (I'm not voting for this
> solution over others, just letting you know that there's financial
> support available, if required).
It'd be
Archaic wrote:
Care to handle it for me while I concentrate on changes that affect the
testing branch?
Yup, done in r6335. I purposefully left it until you'd seen it in case
it caused problems with your current working copies.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: ht
On Jul 2, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
I've come across at least one deal where you can get a dedicated
server (with an AMD chip!) for $60 US/month. This one has 1000 GB
Data Transfer per month.
So, I know there's competitive offers like this out there.
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 10:48:29AM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >
> Looks like it went missing by mistake during the conversion to using
> entities for the patches stuff. tinyurl provided due to the inevitable
> line wrapping of the original viewcvs URL:
Care to handle it for me while I conc
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
On July 1, 2005 03:42 pm, Jason Gurtz wrote:
Maybe it would be worthwhile to see what a call for donations can scratch
up so there can be a dedicated server?
I'd like to cut down the recurring monthly colocations fees.
I've come across at least one deal where you can g
Archaic wrote:
While diffing both sets of XML to ensure all merges were made, I came
across a question. Why is the inetutils kernel header patch not in
trunk?
Looks like it went missing by mistake during the conversion to using
entities for the patches stuff. tinyurl provided due to the inevit
Nathan Coulson wrote:
On 7/2/05, Nathan Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The functions file is getting overly complicated for these 2 simple
tasks, taking a few variables and many lines of code.
(Also, I am going to be reviewing a few more troublespots to see if I
can simplify them)
I
On 7/2/05, Nathan Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The functions file is getting overly complicated for these 2 simple
> tasks, taking a few variables and many lines of code.
>
> (Also, I am going to be reviewing a few more troublespots to see if I
> can simplify them)
>
> I would like to r
The functions file is getting overly complicated for these 2 simple
tasks, taking a few variables and many lines of code.
(Also, I am going to be reviewing a few more troublespots to see if I
can simplify them)
I would like to replace it with a simple echo [but leave the boot_mesg
function, so
Archaic just recently said:
> Each virtual system has full root privs
> and can even reboot the system without affecting any of the other
> systems. I forget the name of the program that allows this. Something
> like jailed or jaild or what not. I cannot remember any details, but it
> might worth
15 matches
Mail list logo
