The installation instructions for Texinfo give an "optional" step for a
"TeX" installation, but it doesn't say why you would need it or what
programs might require it. Some kind of additional description should be
there (even if it's nothing more than "if you don't know what it is, you
don't it
William Harrington wrote:
Hello everybody,
After the last few days of intense toolchain errors and other chap5 to
chap6 anomalies coming into the support channels, I was talking to a few people
about having something in the book to introduce programming tools to people. My
thought goes as
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
and in section 5.6. Glibc-2.3.5 it mentions kernel 2.6.11
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/gcc4/chapter05/glibc.html
It also says that in the development book. Should that be "2.6.11.x or
later"?
Yep, this as with many other things are o
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Andy Neebel wrote:
>
> I haven't been able to do LFS on my tower for a while, but I know that
> I had grub building in 64bit on it once. I have an x86_64, and iirc,
> grub 0.93 didn't like 64bit, but 0.94 did. That's about the newest
> grub that I have used as I haven't had
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:10:11PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> > Please join me in welcoming Ken Moffat to the LFS development team.
>
> Thanks to the people who've welcomed me, hope I prove worthy of it.
A little late, but welcome aboard :)
--
JH
Ag Hatzim wrote these words on 08/10/05 04:15 CST:
> Log of the already installed packages attached,most of them confirmed to work
>
> libxml2-2.6.20
This is odd. LibXML2 crapped out for me during the 'make'.
runtest.o: In function `xpathDocTest':
/home/rml/build/libxml2-2.6.20/runtest.c:2404: u
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Please join me in welcoming Ken Moffat to the LFS development team.
Thanks to the people who've welcomed me, hope I prove worthy of it.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
On 8/10/05, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Archaic wrote:
>
> >LILO is reported to work for 64 bit. You don't seem to be acknowledging
> >that since all I can see is talk of silo, colo, and grub.
> >
> >
> Actually I don't want to add any packages. I have talked to some people
> that hav
> Please join me in welcoming Ken Moffat to the LFS development
> team.
_ _ _ _
| | | |___| |___ ___ _ ___
| | | | -_| | _| . | | -_|
|_|___|_|___|___|_|_|_|___|
__
_| |
| | |___ ___| |
|-| -_| |__|
Welcome aboard Ken, I look forward to your assistance.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
El Viernes, 12 de Agosto de 2005 20:18, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Ken Moffat to the LFS development team. Ken
> has been a long time contributor to both the development and support
> communities, and his knowledge and dedication to the project are certai
Hi folks,
Please join me in welcoming Ken Moffat to the LFS development team. Ken
has been a long time contributor to both the development and support
communities, and his knowledge and dedication to the project are certain
to be beneficial to the project.
Welcome on board Ken!
Regards,
M
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/12/05 11:22 CST:
> 4.1.13a?
>
> Where does this come from? There is no mention of it on the MySQL
> web site, or BLFS.
Never mind. I found it. Apparently, there are MySQL web mirrors that
are not synced up.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 2
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 08/12/05 11:16 CST:
> Yes. I tested that 4.1.13a builds and tests with the book's
> instructions earlier this week, prior to filing bug 1515.
4.1.13a?
Where does this come from? There is no mention of it on the MySQL
web site, or BLFS.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU
Chris Staub wrote:
and in section 5.6. Glibc-2.3.5 it mentions kernel 2.6.11
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/gcc4/chapter05/glibc.html
It also says that in the development book. Should that be "2.6.11.x or
later"?
Yep, this as with many other things are on that TODO list I spoke o
Alexandre Russel wrote:
> Hi
> In the following page, the first link starts with lots of ../../..(but the
> target is good)
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/6.1/introduction/bootscripts.html
> regards
That is correct. It is that way to accomodate the mirrors.
-- Bruce
--
http://li
Andrew Benton wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
The GCC4 book hasn't been touched in over a week, and in that time
there have been several changes to the development trunk that haven't
been applied to GCC4. This includes...
1. Update of Vim security patch
2. Suggestion to add cracklib to Shadow inst
Chris Staub wrote:
The GCC4 book hasn't been touched in over a week, and in that time there
have been several changes to the development trunk that haven't been
applied to GCC4. This includes...
1. Update of Vim security patch
2. Suggestion to add cracklib to Shadow installation
3. text change
Chris Staub wrote these words on 08/12/05 09:39 CST:
> The GCC4 book hasn't been touched in over a week, and in that time there
> have been several changes to the development trunk that haven't been
> applied to GCC4. This includes...
There is only one guy working on this branch and he has admit
The GCC4 book hasn't been touched in over a week, and in that time there
have been several changes to the development trunk that haven't been
applied to GCC4. This includes...
1. Update of Vim security patch
2. Suggestion to add cracklib to Shadow installation
3. text changes to the Shadow inst
20 matches
Mail list logo
