Re: Sed assumptions

2005-08-29 Thread Randy McMurchy
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 08/30/05 01:36 CST: > Whoops, I thought I'd fixed them all already :( Basically, as Jim said, > we can't assume the host can handle '-i'. Therefore, gcc-pass2 needs to > be changed, as do any other occurrences prior to building `sed' in > chapter 5. The '

Re: GCC-4 (more nagging) :-)

2005-08-29 Thread Matthew Burgess
Archaic wrote: What will the new milestone be? 6.2 or 7.0? It seems with as little changes as are required, 6.2 would be viable. Sounds sensible to me. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Sed assumptions

2005-08-29 Thread Matthew Burgess
Ken Moffat wrote: OK, you guys have finally dragged me kicking and screaming towards building with gcc4 (well-known old compilers? I love 'em!). And sitting in the chapter 5 gcc pass 2 instructions I see some 'sed -i' commands. Whoops, I thought I'd fixed them all already :( Basically, as

Re: GCC-4 (more nagging) :-)

2005-08-29 Thread Archaic
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 06:25:52PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote: > > I'll try to get around to getting the two changes in some time this > week, then we'll merge the branch into trunk probably a week after that > (just to give folks a chance to ensure there's no more problems, and > that the 'f

Re: Sed assumptions

2005-08-29 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 08/29/05 19:53 CST: > Chapter 5 is using the distro's host, if it's a earlier version of sed > that doesn't support -i it won't work. Never mind, Jim. :-( But, just to summarize: Ken asked "Why is there a sed -i in Chapter 5 GCC instructions. It won't work ther

Re: Sed assumptions

2005-08-29 Thread Jim Gifford
Randy McMurchy wrote: What does this have to do with a sed -i command used in the Chapter 5 - GCC instructions? Chapter 5 is using the distro's host, if it's a earlier version of sed that doesn't support -i it won't work. -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] LFS User # 2577 Regi

Re: Sed assumptions

2005-08-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > OK, you guys have finally dragged me kicking and screaming towards > building with gcc4 (well-known old compilers? I love 'em!). And sitting > in the chapter 5 gcc pass 2 instructions I see some 'sed -i' commands. > Me, I love these, but have we agreed to raise the bar for hos

Re: Sed assumptions

2005-08-29 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 08/29/05 18:45 CST: > Ken in chapter 5 and before sed -e, needs to be used but after that sed > -i is fine for chatpers 6 and up. What does this have to do with a sed -i command used in the Chapter 5 - GCC instructions? :-) -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2

Re: Sed assumptions

2005-08-29 Thread Jim Gifford
Ken Moffat wrote: OK, you guys have finally dragged me kicking and screaming towards building with gcc4 (well-known old compilers? I love 'em!). And sitting in the chapter 5 gcc pass 2 instructions I see some 'sed -i' commands. Me, I love these, but have we agreed to raise the bar for host

Sed assumptions

2005-08-29 Thread Ken Moffat
OK, you guys have finally dragged me kicking and screaming towards building with gcc4 (well-known old compilers? I love 'em!). And sitting in the chapter 5 gcc pass 2 instructions I see some 'sed -i' commands. Me, I love these, but have we agreed to raise the bar for host systems so that they

Re: GCC-4 (more nagging) :-)

2005-08-29 Thread Jim Gifford
M.Canales.es wrote: Jim, will be cross-lfs updated also to GCC 4 or is there some archs issues? I'm currently on working to making cross-lfs GCC 4 capable. Waiting a response from Matt on a question I sent him. I've been successful building a GCC4 multilib build on a Sparc. Want to test M

Re: GCC-4 (more nagging) :-)

2005-08-29 Thread M.Canales.es
El Lunes, 29 de Agosto de 2005 19:25, Matthew Burgess escribió: > I'll try to get around to getting the two changes in some time this > week, then we'll merge the branch into trunk probably a week after that > (just to give folks a chance to ensure there's no more problems, and > that the 'ftp' an

Re: GCC-4 (more nagging) :-)

2005-08-29 Thread Matthew Burgess
Randy McMurchy wrote: Any thoughts Matt about using GCC-4 as the default SVN build compiler? Apologies for the delay in responding on this - I've been away on holiday. It seems that most folks are happy with the way GCC-4.x is holding up, and with the inetutils patch that's one of the big bug

Re: Use of tar in LFS books

2005-08-29 Thread M.Canales.es
El Lunes, 29 de Agosto de 2005 00:31, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > One of the packages is unpacked from '/sources' while the other one is > unpacked from '../' - Presumably they're located in the same directory. > Which location should we be using? IMHO, ../ Both for consistency with how the patc

Re: Perl-5.8.7 compilation error, Chapter 6

2005-08-29 Thread Matthew Burgess
Kapier wrote: Hi, I have problem with perl. After `make`, a get: Please post to the lfs-support list instead of here. Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page