Re: coreutils (tail, head)

2005-12-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
DJ Lucas wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I was installing the >> Java runtime and the included script had: >> >> tail +122 ... >> >> I had to change it to tail -n +122 ... >> > > jdk-*.bin? or in the source tree? To be precise, it was jai-1_1_2_01-lib-linux-i586-jdk.bin which is the Java Advanc

Re: coreutils (tail, head)

2005-12-13 Thread DJ Lucas
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I was installing the Java runtime and the included script had: tail +122 ... I had to change it to tail -n +122 ... jdk-*.bin? or in the source tree? --DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe:

coreutils (tail, head)

2005-12-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I just ran into a minor problem on a new install. I was installing the Java runtime and the included script had: tail +122 ... I had to change it to tail -n +122 ... I thought this POSIX behavior was reverted in the current coreutils, but apparently not. Do we need to add a patch? -- Bruce

Re: Alphabetical branch status report

2005-12-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 12/12/05, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wrote: > > > BUT, I disagree with the proposed method of obtaining this knowledge. > > As far as I can understand from the discussion, the method is to build > > all possible combinations of Current and Alphabetical chapter 6 from >