On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:51:01 -0500
Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just looking for ways to reduce the temp-system in /tools as much
> as possible. I've built LFS systems before without having ncurses
> there and it works fine. I believe the only issue is texinfo - many
> programs in
On 1/1/06, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
>
> > Additionally, the libgcc_s.so symlink is not needed. Only the
> > libgcc_s.so.1 is needed so that glibc can dlopen that library (used in
> > nptl).
>
> Are you sure?
It found the libgcc_s in
/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-l
Chris Staub wrote:
Well, the text about the "internationalization-related hints" is what
was already there. Also, can't the BLFS page describe locale (not just
UTF-8) issues with LFS packages as well? Or should that be in LFS?
Fixing LFS-related issues is the point of the UTF-8 patch.
--
Alex
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> OK, round 2 here. I made a couple changes, some of which were just
> guesses and haven't affected anything. bison, perl, vim, nscd are
> still causing problems.
Looks pretty good. I'm pretty sure you'll find perl, vim and nscd are
different due to timestamps embedded into
On 12/23/05, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've done an ICA/Farce report on the LFS Alphabetical branch.
OK, round 2 here. I made a couple changes, some of which were just
guesses and haven't affected anything. bison, perl, vim, nscd are
still causing problems. A minimal changelog
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/02/06 14:51 CST:
I'm just looking for ways to reduce the temp-system in /tools as much as
possible. I've built LFS systems before without having ncurses there and
it works fine. I believe the only issue is texinfo - many programs in
cha
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Chris Staub wrote:
Note: this would also necessitate removing "more" from the chap. 5
util-linux, but AFAIK nothing in chap. 6 needs it - it's just there for the
user's convenience (though I never need it myself).
IMHO removing more is a bad idea. Anyway, what's the big
Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/02/06 14:51 CST:
> I'm just looking for ways to reduce the temp-system in /tools as much as
> possible. I've built LFS systems before without having ncurses there and
> it works fine. I believe the only issue is texinfo - many programs in
> chapter 6 need it t
I'm just looking for ways to reduce the temp-system in /tools as much as
possible. I've built LFS systems before without having ncurses there and
it works fine. I believe the only issue is texinfo - many programs in
chapter 6 need it to build their info pages, but I believe they only
need the "
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
-To save time, an alternative to running the
-previous command (which generates and installs every locale listed in
the
-glibc-&glibc-version;/localedata/SUPPORTED file) is to install only
those
-locales that are wanted and needed. This can be
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
@@ -168,7 +162,7 @@
installed only for GCC and Gettext tests to pass, and the
watch program (part of the Procps package) does
not work
properly in them. Various attempts to circumvent these restrictions are
-documented in internationalization
Chris Staub wrote:
@@ -168,7 +162,7 @@
installed only for GCC and Gettext tests to pass, and the
watch program (part of the Procps package) does not work
properly in them. Various attempts to circumvent these restrictions are
-documented in internationalization-related hints.
+documented in i
Chris Staub wrote:
-To save time, an alternative to running the
-previous command (which generates and installs every locale listed in the
-glibc-&glibc-version;/localedata/SUPPORTED file) is to install only those
-locales that are wanted and needed. This can be achieved by using the
-localedef
13 matches
Mail list logo
