Re: Alphabetical Build Clean [Was Re: [Alphabetical] Build order, Bug 684, Issue with Bash patch]

2006-03-26 Thread M.Canales.es
El Sábado, 25 de Marzo de 2006 22:41, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: To me, it just seems easier to work with dependencies all in one file rather than separately in each chapter06 file. Especially as we're looking at including another page (IIRC) that describes more of the rationale for

Re: gcc specs patch

2006-03-26 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Andrew Benton wrote: Hello World. The gcc-specs patch seems to patch a lot of files that are architecture specific. It seems to me that most of these archs are covered by cross-LFS and LFS focuses mainly on i386. For i386 the gcc specs patch can be replaced with these commands # link to

Re: gcc specs patch

2006-03-26 Thread Andrew Benton
Dan Nicholson wrote: I prefer the sed as well, but I believe you've made more of it than needs be. Certainly we don't need to adjust i386/gnu.h unless this project is being converted to Hurd from Scratch. :-) He he, thanks for that. It just goes to show that I don't know what I'm doing. I'd

Re: 'which' script

2006-03-26 Thread USM Bish
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:20:34AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: On 3/26/06, Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the piping through 'head' really necessary ? 'type -p' alone seems to do the job ... Indeed, head isn't needed even if the binary is in two places in