Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Luca
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: Luca wrote: Another bug, manifested in grub-0.97, after applying reiser4 patch: automake --add-missing docs/Makefile.am:3: compiling `kernel.c' with per-target flags requires `AM_PROG_CC_C_O' in `configure.ac' /usr/share/automake-1.10/am/depend2.am:

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/07/06 00:10 CST: This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to BLFS and integrate the hint there. -1. I can't see multiple versions of autotools

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Randy McMurchy wrote: Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/07/06 00:10 CST: This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to BLFS and integrate the hint there. -1. I can't see multiple

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Randy McMurchy wrote: Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/07/06 00:10 CST: This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to BLFS and integrate the hint there. -1. I can't see

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/07/06 06:36 CST: Yes, except that there is currently no reiser4 page, but it is not my point (I could just as well create it in the wiki). The question is whether we install /usr/bin/auto* just for beauty (with no intention to call it), or for

Patches issues

2006-12-07 Thread M.Canales.es
In HLFS trunk: glibc-2.5-dl_execstack_PaX-1.patch does not match MD5SUMS value NEW MD5SUM: d3c45b9f63a3f0f6cf5847d4ae4f9759 glibc-2.5-localedef_segfault-1.patch does not match MD5SUMS value NEW MD5SUM: 879fcc4d60526a4796e5d99d5839de38 texinfo-4.8a-tempfile_fix-2.patch not found in the

GSView

2006-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, There is a ticket in Trac for an issue with GSView-4.7. http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2175 The issue is valid. The new EPS Ghostscript internal versioning scheme breaks GSView. I found that simply modifying src/gvcver.h in the GSView sources fixes the issue. I simply

Re: Patches issues

2006-12-07 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 7 de Diciembre de 2006 13:57, M.Canales.es escribió: All that missing patches prevent HLFS be build using jhalfs and also prevent to update the FTP mirrors. Sorry, missing patches are actually the ones listed in http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/hlfs/svn/copyerrs and

Trac #1980

2006-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, This is mostly a note for Tushar, but FYI for others. I'd like to close out http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1980 by removing the autoreconf command. Tushar is assigned to the ticket, so I'll wait a couple of days for a reply from him. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25]

Released jhalfs-2.1

2006-12-07 Thread M.Canales.es
The jhalfs development team is pleased to announce the release of jhalfs-2.1. New features in this version: - Better support for CLFS Sysroot book - Added support for CLFS Embedded book - Several bugs fixes and code clean-up The jhalfs-2.1 tarball can be downloaded from

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: The question is whether we install /usr/bin/auto* just for beauty (with no intention to call it), or for a functional purpose. As far as I can remember the past discussions, autotools are a part of the development platform that LFS aims to be. You make a good

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Bryan Kadzban
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 05:36:45PM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: The question is whether the real use of autotools in existing projects is just assumed to never happen. Well, I can't say I've thought about it much, but I have fixed autotools breakage before, in beyond-BLFS programs.

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Matthew Burgess
This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to BLFS and integrate the hint there. Well, I've long wanted to get rid of the autotools from LFS but for purely selfish reasons (I've never had a need

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 12/7/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: The question is whether we install /usr/bin/auto* just for beauty (with no intention to call it), or for a functional purpose. As far as I can remember the past discussions, autotools are a part of the development

Re: Autotools

2006-12-07 Thread Greg Schafer
Matthew Burgess wrote: This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to BLFS and integrate the hint there. Well, I've long wanted to get rid of the autotools from LFS but for purely selfish