Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Luca wrote:
Another bug, manifested in grub-0.97, after applying reiser4 patch:
automake --add-missing
docs/Makefile.am:3: compiling `kernel.c' with per-target flags requires
`AM_PROG_CC_C_O' in `configure.ac'
/usr/share/automake-1.10/am/depend2.am:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/07/06 00:10 CST:
This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing
multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to
BLFS and integrate the hint there.
-1. I can't see multiple versions of autotools
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/07/06 00:10 CST:
This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing
multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to
BLFS and integrate the hint there.
-1. I can't see multiple
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/07/06 00:10 CST:
This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing
multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to
BLFS and integrate the hint there.
-1. I can't see
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 12/07/06 06:36 CST:
Yes, except that there is currently no reiser4 page, but it is not my
point (I could just as well create it in the wiki). The question is
whether we install /usr/bin/auto* just for beauty (with no intention to
call it), or for
In HLFS trunk:
glibc-2.5-dl_execstack_PaX-1.patch does not match MD5SUMS value
NEW MD5SUM: d3c45b9f63a3f0f6cf5847d4ae4f9759
glibc-2.5-localedef_segfault-1.patch does not match MD5SUMS value
NEW MD5SUM: 879fcc4d60526a4796e5d99d5839de38
texinfo-4.8a-tempfile_fix-2.patch not found in the
Hi all,
There is a ticket in Trac for an issue with GSView-4.7.
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2175
The issue is valid. The new EPS Ghostscript internal versioning
scheme breaks GSView. I found that simply modifying src/gvcver.h
in the GSView sources fixes the issue. I simply
El Jueves, 7 de Diciembre de 2006 13:57, M.Canales.es escribió:
All that missing patches prevent HLFS be build using jhalfs and also
prevent to update the FTP mirrors.
Sorry, missing patches are actually the ones listed in
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/hlfs/svn/copyerrs
and
Hi all,
This is mostly a note for Tushar, but FYI for others. I'd like to
close out http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1980 by
removing the autoreconf command.
Tushar is assigned to the ticket, so I'll wait a couple of days for
a reply from him.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25]
The jhalfs development team is pleased to announce the release of jhalfs-2.1.
New features in this version:
- Better support for CLFS Sysroot book
- Added support for CLFS Embedded book
- Several bugs fixes and code clean-up
The jhalfs-2.1 tarball can be downloaded from
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The question is
whether we install /usr/bin/auto* just for beauty (with no intention to
call it), or for a functional purpose. As far as I can remember the past
discussions, autotools are a part of the development platform that LFS
aims to be.
You make a good
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 05:36:45PM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The question is whether the real use of autotools in existing projects
is just assumed to never happen.
Well, I can't say I've thought about it much, but I have fixed autotools
breakage before, in beyond-BLFS programs.
This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing
multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to
BLFS and integrate the hint there.
Well, I've long wanted to get rid of the autotools from LFS but for purely
selfish reasons (I've never had a need
On 12/7/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The question is
whether we install /usr/bin/auto* just for beauty (with no intention to
call it), or for a functional purpose. As far as I can remember the past
discussions, autotools are a part of the development
Matthew Burgess wrote:
This is a formal request to either integrate Tushar's hint on installing
multiple versions of autotools into the LFS book, or move autotools to
BLFS and integrate the hint there.
Well, I've long wanted to get rid of the autotools from LFS but for purely
selfish
15 matches
Mail list logo