Hi,
I'm not sure whether exiting app whenever fwrite() or something fails.
It could be non-critical for application run and if it decided to ignore it,
we shouldn't enforce author to add unneeded checking. We should, however, be
able to learn it. So, what about creating small header file l
Hi,
> So anyway. In coreutils chapter 6 I'm planning to add alternatives
> for /bin/true and /bin/false for i386 assembly code.
+1, Funny
> Also, the
> sha/md5 stuff can be replaced by the openssl(1) shell script, which
> was on hlfs-dev not long ago.
I hear ya; http://jh.gvn.cz/~jd870911/hlfs
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Connolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hardened LFS Development List"
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: 2.4 branch
...
> I read linux-2.4 kernel's are also smaller when built with gcc-4.1.1. I
think
> that's one of the principal reasons
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> files on the DVD are not writable
>
> What are you talking about? This is still a CD, and every file can be
> overwritten (but the changes don't survive a reboot).
That's what I meant: the changes don't survive a reboot.
-- Bruce
--
http:
El Sábado, 9 de Diciembre de 2006 05:30, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
>
> Please don't ask questions how to do the above - you are assumed to know
> this, otherwise jhalfs is not for you.
>
>
> Objections? Corrections?
Good, I like it.
Plus, that p
