Luca wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Only a reflection.
> LFS officially supports Ext3 as default file-system and in BLFS book we
> find under File Systems ReiserFS and XFS progs. These filesystems are
> judged stable (Reiser4 is not judgeable as it is too young but it's
> faster than those; I found only a bu
Barius Drubeck wrote:
> Shouldn't the toolchain and kernel always be compiled in the C locale?
No, see http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1938
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See th
Hi Dan.
I didn't mean that it is said you *must* or some editor's preference or
else I simply mean another thing, here reported some of his words
(Alexader) in a private conversation:
"Anyway, I am afraid that any attempt to build LFS on any filesystem
other than ext3 is now considered an unfo
On 2/2/07, Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LFS officially supports Ext3 as default file-system and in BLFS book we
> find under File Systems ReiserFS and XFS progs. These filesystems are
> judged stable
You're actually reading more into this than there is. There is no
"officially supported" fil
On 2/2/07, Barius Drubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On the other hand, it is indeed a problem specific to supporting and
> maintaining ancient systems with ancient glibc, thus temporaly far
> *beyond* LFS, and therefore has little to do with a fresh LFS build
> of a new system.
Actually, this
Hi.
Only a reflection.
LFS officially supports Ext3 as default file-system and in BLFS book we
find under File Systems ReiserFS and XFS progs. These filesystems are
judged stable (Reiser4 is not judgeable as it is too young but it's
faster than those; I found only a bug after testing it for som
Hey guys, ran across this one that has been bugging me for a long time
since I still do BLFS manually. I have no problems when added, but the
&& has been missing here for a long, long time. docbook is certainly
not my specialty, so I didn't know if it was intentional, or if it's
really been o
On Saturday 03 February 2007 01:07, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:12:44PM +, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > On Friday 02 February 2007 22:55, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2007-February
> > >/032433.html
> >
> > Wow, that's very useful
Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> DJ: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2186
I think this one was already handled by the Alsa changes that Dan took
care of. We wanted to leave it open for Ken's comments, but it's been
20 days since requested for comment. I'm closing it now as invalid.
--
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 05:12, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> > Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > How about:
> >
> > $ sed -r 's/.*(gcc version [01234567890\.]+).*/\1/' /proc/version
>
> This string depends on the locale in use when the kernel was
> compiled, so it will not work on all sy
On 2/2/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let me know if the problems recur and I'll look at it more.
Huh. Well, everything's working now. If it happens again, I'll let you know.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Hey Bruce,
>
> When I login to the LFS wiki (and sometimes BLFS), Trac keeps dropping
> my credentials periodically. So, I click the Login button and
> authenticate. Then I change to a new page and I'm no longer listed as
> logged in above the taskbar and I can't do anything
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:07:54AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I hadn't realised until now that the LFS info was in a wiki. To me,
> the content, and indeed the format in which it was posted, are a hint.
> Hints have a couple of differences from wikis - the text remains under
> the control (and co
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:12:44PM +, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Friday 02 February 2007 22:55, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2007-February/032433.html
>
> Wow, that's very useful information indeed.
>
> > I'd like it if he'd put that info on t
Hey Bruce,
When I login to the LFS wiki (and sometimes BLFS), Trac keeps dropping
my credentials periodically. So, I click the Login button and
authenticate. Then I change to a new page and I'm no longer listed as
logged in above the taskbar and I can't do anything requiring
privileges. If I hit t
On 2/2/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 02 February 2007 22:55, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2007-February/032433.html
>
> Wow, that's very useful information indeed.
That's what I said.
> Yes, I think that sounds like a se
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Does blfs-book get notified when the Wiki pages are edited?
I don't think Trac has that capability yet. IIRC, version 0.11, now in
beta, is supposed to have that capability.
> The reason I ask is that I don't want
> editors to have to periodically trawl though the Wi
On Friday 02 February 2007 22:55, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2007-February/032433.html
Wow, that's very useful information indeed.
> I'd like it if he'd put that info on the Wiki, but I don't know where
> to tell him to put it or how anyone would be
One thing that has worked out very well in BLFS is having the Notes
area of the Wiki where people can collect extra tidbits of
information.
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/BlfsNotes
The LFS Wiki doesn't have the same level of organization. It'd be nice
if we could do something like tha
Barius Drubeck wrote:
> On Monday 29 January 2007 05:49, Marty _ wrote:
>
>> dont suppose anyone knows the general needed commands/utils for a
>> successful login?
>> i.e. i have '(hostname) login:'
>> i type root
>> waits 20-30 seconds
>> and repeats.
>>
>> sulogin works inside the bootscripts.
On Friday 02 February 2007 14:33, TheOldFellow wrote:
> The third problem is that LFS is almost dead (although BLFS is still
> alive and kicking - It's great to see how much effort you guys are
> putting in, and it's appreciated, I assure you.) and despite Gerard
> having finally built the replace
On 2/2/07, TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know this is none of my business, but to my mind there is a great deal
> of difference between a build-time dependency and a run-time one.
>
> An optional run-time dependency IS part of the configuration:
> WUIP (Will Use If Present) vs WRINP
On 2/1/07, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > On 2/1/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> #1957 was closed then reopened. If there is discussion necessary,
> >> someone please open a new thread in blfs-dev.
> >
> > I'd prefer if Alexander took
Jeff Davis wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> As a general policy, we have not been directly addressing x86_64 in
>> BLFS. It may be addressed in the future. We would appreciate it if
>> you could post this in the aRts section of the BLFS wiki though.
>
> I'd be happy to! However, ma
On Monday 29 January 2007 05:49, Marty _ wrote:
> dont suppose anyone knows the general needed commands/utils for a
> successful login?
> i.e. i have '(hostname) login:'
> i type root
> waits 20-30 seconds
> and repeats.
>
> sulogin works inside the bootscripts.
> shadow has been installed. (and ru
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I would therefore like LFS to change its instructions so that multiple
> versions of the tools can be installed, although LFS itself will continue to
> just install the latest versions (unless, of course, it needs to use a
> previous release). Suitable explanatory mate
26 matches
Mail list logo
