On 2/19/07, TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > After the error the other day with dash and glibc-2.3.6,
>
> I prefer to install bash and start all the bootscripts #!/bin/bash to
> make it clear that anyone who wants to use another shell is on their
> own. :-)
Very
On 2/19/07, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could you please install posh from
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/posh/posh_0.5.4.tar.gz and test
> whether it reveals any additional breakage?
I'll take a look at it. Any background on posh?
> > Second patch is just a t
On 2/19/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > First patch is to eliminated "echo -[en]" since it's not always
> > supported by POSIX shells. I chose to use printf since it was a
> > builtin in dash. I didn't notice until later that it's not mentioned
> > in POSIX.
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> After the error the other day with dash and glibc-2.3.6,
I prefer to install bash and start all the bootscripts #!/bin/bash to
make it clear that anyone who wants to use another shell is on their
own. :-)
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: h
Dan Nicholson пишет:
> After the error the other day with dash and glibc-2.3.6, I decided to
> install dash[1] and give it a whirl as /bin/sh. Things went mostly
> pretty well with respect to rogue bashisms throughout the system. I've
> attached some patches to fix up the bootscripts while consulti
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> First patch is to eliminated "echo -[en]" since it's not always
> supported by POSIX shells. I chose to use printf since it was a
> builtin in dash. I didn't notice until later that it's not mentioned
> in POSIX. And the executable printf is in /usr/bin. We can maintain
> th
After the error the other day with dash and glibc-2.3.6, I decided to
install dash[1] and give it a whirl as /bin/sh. Things went mostly
pretty well with respect to rogue bashisms throughout the system. I've
attached some patches to fix up the bootscripts while consulting the
POSIX spec on shells[
1. Perhaps it should be made somewhat clearer that the "Linux-Headers"
installation comes from the kernel tarball. More than one user has come
into the IRC chat asking if it was the CLFS "Linux-Headers" package.
2. The toolchain-adjustment section says that you can edit the specs
file by hand,
