Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> You can read it online or you can download the book from to read it at
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.3/
>
The LFS FTP mirror is up-to-date, there is a 6.3 tarball of packages
available for download. It will take a bit of time to sync to all ftp
mirrors, but
The LFS team is proud to announce the release of LFS-6.2-pre1, the first
pre-release of the upcoming LFS-6.2 book.
You can read it online or you can download the book from to read it at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.3/
For a full list of changes, I refer you to the changelog included
On 8/28/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Modified: html/trunk/lfs/news.html
> > ===
> > --- html/trunk/lfs/news.html 2007-08-21 16:08:34 UTC (rev 927)
> > +++ html/trunk/lfs/news.html 2007-08-28 22:00:14 UTC (rev 928)
> Modified: html/trunk/lfs/news.html
> ===
> --- html/trunk/lfs/news.html 2007-08-21 16:08:34 UTC (rev 927)
> +++ html/trunk/lfs/news.html 2007-08-28 22:00:14 UTC (rev 928)
> @@ -6,6 +6,29 @@
> | RSS Feed |
>
>
> + LFS 6.3 Release
> +
If anyone has clean test/build logs to contribute for the 6.3 book,
please tar them up and post them with a hardware description.
Preferably Ch. 5 and Ch. 6, but just Ch. 6 will do. They will
eventually go here:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/
I have logs for the Ch. 6 tests form
Hi all,
It appears that the Gmane email-to-news gateway is broken right
now. Gmane shows nothing for today, yet there have been many
messages sent to the various groups.
I don't have access to my regular email right now, and must
use mail2web, so if this is a redundant message please disregard.
On 8/28/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:01:36 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:28:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Are there any objections to releasing what is in branches/6.3 tomorrow
> >> night as 6.3 fina
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:01:36 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:28:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Are there any objections to releasing what is in branches/6.3 tomorrow
>> night as 6.3 final?
>
> We have to let go at some point. Now seems a decent eno
