Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> What this means is that the process to update bootscripts is now to change
>> the appropriate file in BOOK/bootscripts and update the entity in
>> packages.ent
>>
>> To have the current date.
>> Likewise, for udev-config, update the files in BOO
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> What this means is that the process to update bootscripts is now to change
> the
> appropriate file in BOOK/bootscripts and update the entity in packages.ent
>
> To have the current date.
>
> Likewise, for udev-config, update the files in BOOK/udev-config and the entity
I have just made some relatively large changes in the LFS build procedure.
1. Both bootscripts and udev-config directories have been moved to be under the
BOOK directory.
2. The Makefile has been updated to automatically generate the bootscripts and
udev-config tarballs. The entities that speci
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 15:18:39 Mateusz Grotek wrote:
> >
> Yes. I understand that. So i'm trying to send this patch to libc-alpha
> too. I donno if glibc utilities would work with dash (without bash
> installed). But if it is possible, we could give users choice which
> shell they like. Pe
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/1, Gilles Espinasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> cp configure{,.bak}
>> cp: missing destination file operand after `configure{,.bak}'
>> Try `cp --help' for more information.
>
> This simply can't happen if the us
Selon Mateusz Grotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes. I understand that. So i'm trying to send this patch to libc-alpha
> too. I donno if glibc utilities would work with dash (without bash
> installed). But if it is possible, we could give users choice which
> shell they like. People from ubuntu made d
Gilles Espinasse pisze:
> Selon Mateusz Grotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> Bruce Dubbs pisze:
>>
>>> Mateusz Grotek wrote:
>>>
>>>
> ...
>
and that's all. With this fix it works correctly and this sed thing if
LFS book isn't needed. You could ask why this solution is bet
Selon Mateusz Grotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bruce Dubbs pisze:
> > Mateusz Grotek wrote:
> >
...
> >> and that's all. With this fix it works correctly and this sed thing if
> >> LFS book isn't needed. You could ask why this solution is better than fix?
> >> It is, because it enables you not to use
Bruce Dubbs pisze:
> Mateusz Grotek wrote:
>
>> Hi. There is some simple solution to make ldd.bash.in work with dash,
>> and other shells.
>> Change this line:
>> BEGIN
>> if set -o pipefail 2> /dev/null; then
>> END
>> to these two lines:
>> BEGIN
>> if set -o | grep pipefail 1> /dev/null 2> /
