On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:16 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
cpio, no. Nothing uses it except rpm (and see above about that one).
I've added cpio to my standard install, for use in the construction
and editing of initramfs images. Other than that I agree, it's mostly
for RPM users.
Zach
On 10/27/2009 12:16 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Noting which programs are needed wouldn't be too bad. Moving a lot of
> them into LFS, I wouldn't like. Most of the stuff you mentioned is
> pretty rarely needed in reality -- or at least, on my system, which is
> mostly all I care about. Obviously
On 10/26/2009 10:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been looking at LSB and in running a couple of basic checks find that we
> have some missing libraries and programs in LFS/BLFS to get to compliance.
> The
> discussion below is only a start. There may be more needed after I get their
> more comp
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been looking at LSB and in running a couple of basic checks find
> that we have some missing libraries and programs in LFS/BLFS to get
> to compliance.
Surprise.
LSB is by *no* means minimal. Neither is LFS, of course, but when you
require a specific package manager to
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been looking at LSB and in running a couple of basic checks find that we
> have some missing libraries and programs in LFS/BLFS to get to compliance.
> The
> discussion below is only a start. There may be more needed after I get their
>
I've been looking at LSB and in running a couple of basic checks find that we
have some missing libraries and programs in LFS/BLFS to get to compliance. The
discussion below is only a start. There may be more needed after I get their
more comprehensive test suite running.
Although I've instal
This conversation would be better on lfs-support.
James
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:47:52AM -0700, kevin631012 wrote:
> Hi All,
> good news is I add SATA drivers in my kernel . it's able to Mount /dev/root
> now .
> Thanks for all of your information and clues .
Please observe proper netiquette:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/#netiquette
Posts sh
Hi Mike,
Thanks , but this issue occurs while system booting . so , I wonder the way you
mentioned how can I use ? it even not normally boot up yet . sorry I didn't
tell in detail . @_@
> The message is usually seen when
> attempting to dismount a drive that has
> a file that is still open by
The message is usually seen when attempting to dismount a drive that has
a file that is still open by a process. You can usually use lsof and ps
to figure out which process has a file open on the device.
kevin631012 wrote:
> Hi All,
> I got a problem as title . what I am thinking is what kind o
Hi All,
I got a problem as title . what I am thinking is what kind of driver will cause
system halt like this ? because I turn on a lot of options in Kernel for sake
of debugging boot issue .
___
您的生活即時通 － 溝通、娛樂、生活、工作一次搞定！
http://messenger.ya
___
您的生活即時通 － 溝通、娛樂、生活、工作一次搞定！
http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi All,
good news is I add SATA drivers in my kernel . it's able to Mount /dev/root now
. Thanks for all of your information and clues .
PS: bad new is I have another problems now !
^o^
--- 09/10/23 (五)，ALIP BUDIANTO 寫道：
> 寄件者: ALIP BUDIANTO
> 主旨: Re: I got error at chapter 8.4. GRUB-0.97
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
