Re: klogd and System.map

2010-02-19 Thread Gilles Espinasse
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dubbs" To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:39 PM Subject: Re: klogd and System.map > linux fan wrote: > > On 2/19/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> My first choice right now is the script with the unconditional -x as a > >> s

Re: klogd and System.map

2010-02-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
linux fan wrote: > On 2/19/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> My first choice right now is the script with the unconditional -x as a >> second choice. > > It seems script effectively does unconditional -x because > it greps for Version_ which is what they removed > which triggered this whole business. Wi

Re: klogd and System.map

2010-02-19 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bryan Kadzban wrote: >> David Jensen wrote: >>> from slackware rc.syslog >>> # '-c 3' = display level 'error' or higher messages on console >> Starting to get off topic now, but after reading the klogd manpage, this >> is exactly what the current LFS bootscripts do when you

Re: klogd and System.map

2010-02-19 Thread linux fan
On 2/19/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > My first choice right now is the script with the unconditional -x as a > second choice. It seems script effectively does unconditional -x because it greps for Version_ which is what they removed which triggered this whole business. Does -x cause loss of informati

(x86_64) Solution for failed "make check", in ch.6 e2fsprogs

2010-02-19 Thread Matthias Eck
Hello, i personally got this problem recently, but it seems to be there for a while. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2009-July/063022.html It is, maybe, fixed now by the maintainer of e2fsprogs with a new version. http://old.nabble.com/e2fsprogs-segfaults-during-make-check-to2

Re: LFS 6.6-rc1 corrections

2010-02-19 Thread Zachary Kotlarek
On Feb 19, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > Being a speaker of "British English" rather than "US English" I would > actually say "maths libraries" rather than "math libraries". I've never > quite understood why Americans drop the 's'. The word being contracted is > 'mathematics' (plur

Re: LFS 6.6-rc1 corrections

2010-02-19 Thread Jim DeMarco
Hi Matthew! Thanks for the quick reply! On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > Just one minor point: > >> p. xiii: >> "This package package contains math libraries" >> should be >> "This package contains math libraries" > > Being a speaker of "British English" rather than "US

Re: LFS 6.6-rc1 corrections

2010-02-19 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:06:20 -0500, Jim DeMarco wrote: > Hi! > > I have just started reading the LFS documentation and would like > to propose the following [minor] corrections to LFS 6.6-rc1. They > apply to LFS-BOOK-6.6-rc1.pdf and are mostly typos and some > grammar mistakes. Thanks for the

LFS 6.6-rc1 corrections

2010-02-19 Thread Jim DeMarco
Hi! I have just started reading the LFS documentation and would like to propose the following [minor] corrections to LFS 6.6-rc1. They apply to LFS-BOOK-6.6-rc1.pdf and are mostly typos and some grammar mistakes. --Jim DeMarco p. ix: "Some other facts about a 64-bit systems need to be added her