- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: klogd and System.map
> linux fan wrote:
> > On 2/19/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> My first choice right now is the script with the unconditional -x as a
> >> s
linux fan wrote:
> On 2/19/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> My first choice right now is the script with the unconditional -x as a
>> second choice.
>
> It seems script effectively does unconditional -x because
> it greps for Version_ which is what they removed
> which triggered this whole business.
Wi
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> David Jensen wrote:
>>> from slackware rc.syslog
>>> # '-c 3' = display level 'error' or higher messages on console
>> Starting to get off topic now, but after reading the klogd manpage, this
>> is exactly what the current LFS bootscripts do when you
On 2/19/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> My first choice right now is the script with the unconditional -x as a
> second choice.
It seems script effectively does unconditional -x because
it greps for Version_ which is what they removed
which triggered this whole business.
Does -x cause loss of informati
Hello,
i personally got this problem recently, but it seems to be there for a while.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2009-July/063022.html
It is, maybe, fixed now by the maintainer of e2fsprogs with a new version.
http://old.nabble.com/e2fsprogs-segfaults-during-make-check-to2
On Feb 19, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Being a speaker of "British English" rather than "US English" I would
> actually say "maths libraries" rather than "math libraries". I've never
> quite understood why Americans drop the 's'. The word being contracted is
> 'mathematics' (plur
Hi Matthew!
Thanks for the quick reply!
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> Just one minor point:
>
>> p. xiii:
>> "This package package contains math libraries"
>> should be
>> "This package contains math libraries"
>
> Being a speaker of "British English" rather than "US
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:06:20 -0500, Jim DeMarco wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have just started reading the LFS documentation and would like
> to propose the following [minor] corrections to LFS 6.6-rc1. They
> apply to LFS-BOOK-6.6-rc1.pdf and are mostly typos and some
> grammar mistakes.
Thanks for the
Hi!
I have just started reading the LFS documentation and would like
to propose the following [minor] corrections to LFS 6.6-rc1. They
apply to LFS-BOOK-6.6-rc1.pdf and are mostly typos and some
grammar mistakes.
--Jim DeMarco
p. ix:
"Some other facts about a 64-bit systems need to be added her