Re: Summary: Using the LSB Bootscripts

2011-05-16 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Zachary Kotlarek wrote: On May 15, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: I'm trying to figure out why it'd be necessary to do this. We already have the previous configuration of every interface stuffed away in /run, and we use that when deciding which service scripts to call when

Re: udevadm --settle

2011-05-16 Thread Bryan Kadzban
DJ Lucas wrote: stuff about settle being broken I see some traffic on linux-hotplug about this as well, so it looks like it's not LFS-specific, at least. (Arch and Debian have both had bugs reported about this.) The messages from Kay so far seem encouraging, as well. ...Oh, and I see the

Re: udevadm --settle

2011-05-16 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/16/2011 12:59 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: stuff about settle being broken I see some traffic on linux-hotplug about this as well, so it looks like it's not LFS-specific, at least. (Arch and Debian have both had bugs reported about this.) The messages from Kay so far seem

Re: Summary: Using the LSB Bootscripts

2011-05-16 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/16/2011 12:49 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: Zachary Kotlarek wrote: On May 15, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: I'm trying to figure out why it'd be necessary to do this. We already have the previous configuration of every interface stuffed away in /run, and we use that when

Re: Summary: Using the LSB Bootscripts

2011-05-16 Thread Zachary Kotlarek
On May 16, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: I also *think* the only way the cached config might not match the running config is if root mucked with the running config manually. Or when /run is not writable at the time the network scripts execute. Or if the cached config were lost for

Re: Summary: Using the LSB Bootscripts

2011-05-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Zachary Kotlarek wrote: On May 16, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: I also *think* the only way the cached config might not match the running config is if root mucked with the running config manually. Or when /run is not writable at the time the network scripts execute. The only

Re: Summary: Using the LSB Bootscripts

2011-05-16 Thread DJ Lucas
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Zachary Kotlarek wrote: On May 16, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: I also *think* the only way the cached config might not match the running config is if root mucked with the running config manually. Or when /run is not writable at the

Re: Summary: Using the LSB Bootscripts

2011-05-16 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Zachary Kotlarek wrote: A compromise might be to provide an `ifreset` script, that does a full ipflush, walks the services dir calling a `reset` target, etc., but *not* integrate that script into ifdown. That seems like a pretty good idea. :-) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital