Re: [lfs-dev] LFS Direction

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I'd like to discuss the direction of LFS with respect to where upstream >> developers appear to be going. >> >> Currently we use sysvinit and udev as the basis of bringing up LFS.  We

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS Direction

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I'd like to discuss the direction of LFS with respect to where upstream > developers appear to be going. > > Currently we use sysvinit and udev as the basis of bringing up LFS.  We > do not use an initd/initramfs or systemd. > > http://wiki.deb

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS Direction

On Thursday 12 January 2012 04:32:49 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I'd like to discuss the direction of LFS with respect to where upstream > developers appear to be going. > > Currently we use sysvinit and udev as the basis of bringing up LFS. We > do not use an initd/initramfs or systemd. > > LFS now

[lfs-dev] LFS Direction

I'd like to discuss the direction of LFS with respect to where upstream developers appear to be going. Currently we use sysvinit and udev as the basis of bringing up LFS. We do not use an initd/initramfs or systemd. http://wiki.debian.org/InitrdReplacementOptions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I