[lfs-dev] 2 quick items

Just 2 quick items: 1) In chapter 3, can someone please add a link to the kbd home page? It's http://www.kbd-project.org/ 2) In stable LFS, the wget list link to man-pages points to http://man7.org/linux/download/man-pages/ but that no longer works, could someone please change it to http://ww

Re: [lfs-dev] Serious regression with gcc-4.7.0

On 3/29/12 3:54 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 29/03/2012 19:13, Pierre Labastie a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> #include "..." search starts here: >> #include<...> search starts here: >> /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/include >> >> /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/x86

Re: [lfs-dev] Serious regression with gcc-4.7.0

Le 29/03/2012 19:13, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > Hi, > > #include "..." search starts here: > #include<...> search starts here: >/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/include >/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/include-fixed >/tools/incl

[lfs-dev] Serious regression with gcc-4.7.0

Hi, When building with the "old" toolchain (gcc-4.6.3, glibc-2.14.1, svn r9785), the ouput of: echo 'int main(){}' | gcc -v -Wl,--verbose -xc - (with PATH=/tools/bin:...) after gcc-pass2 gives: [...] GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 ignoring nonexistent

Re: [lfs-dev] Difficulty Bridging dhcp eth0 in LFS

Qrux wrote: > The current bridging scripts are up for review...Just waiting for > some folks to finish up other things so they have time to look at it. Q, Please open an LFS ticket (or perhaps BLFS ticket -- this is one of those in-between areas) for this and attach your scripts there. It's a

Re: [lfs-dev] Coreutils uname patch for all arches

On Mar 28, 2012, at 9:37 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: > Drop is better for the book. +1 JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] binutils patch

在 2012年3月28日 下午4:32，Matthew Burgess 写道： > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:23:57 +0200, Pierre Labastie > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The binutils patch in chapter05/binutils-pass{1,2} should be applied >> before changing directory to binutils-build:-) . Chapter06/binutils is OK. > > See, that's what I get from b

Re: [lfs-dev] Difficulty Bridging dhcp eth0 in LFS

On Mar 29, 2012, at 12:31 AM, Simon O'Riordan wrote: > I've been searching for about a week and am now going over old links, so I > think > I may have exhausted the literature. > I'm not (yet) an expert on networking LFS. > What I want to do is add a dhcp ethernet interface to a bridge. > I am t

Re: [lfs-dev] suggest check for ed

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:01:51 +0100 Cyril LEVIS wrote: > Hi, > > I think the test script in part vii should check for "ed" binary. It is > not installed by default on a debian-testing-amd64-netinst for example > (like my previous gawk and bison) Just out of intrest, why should we care if ed is

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.15 with i686

Le 29/03/2012 08:47, Matt Burgess a écrit : > On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 22:39 -0400, Ivan Wagner wrote: >> Matt, >> >>> Whoops, yes, it was in chapter 6, but not in chapter 5. Fixed in r9792. >> The fix got put in the middle of something else so that the line now reads: >> >> "The Glibc documentation

[lfs-dev] suggest check for ed

Hi, I think the test script in part vii should check for "ed" binary. It is not installed by default on a debian-testing-amd64-netinst for example (like my previous gawk and bison) Patch need it for make check for example. :) Regards, Cyril --

[lfs-dev] Difficulty Bridging dhcp eth0 in LFS

I've been searching for about a week and am now going over old links, so I think I may have exhausted the literature. I'm not (yet) an expert on networking LFS. What I want to do is add a dhcp ethernet interface to a bridge. I am trying to use the blfs scripting as far as possible, and have found n