On 5/20/12 7:09 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> The more I think about this, the less happy I am. Point 2 doesn't
> really help editing BLFS as far as I can see (upgrading a package
> usually needs several builds - typically, for me, a first to see if
> it actually works when I use it, then others to ge
Hi..
I was pointed to the "Once More: Package Management" discussion
yesterday. So I just joined this list.
First I want to thank you for LFS. It's great. I love it. And i made a
few more people love it, too. The same is true for BLFS.
I will start with many words about my LFS background 8)
Le 22/05/2012 01:58, Armin K. a écrit :
> Also, I see you mention package managers ... For me, Debian's dpkg is
> the hardest one. debian/rules file uses Makefile syntax which I am not
> familiar with. Red Hat's rpm uses some kind of spec file which doesn't
> seem that hard to understand, but still
