Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/31/12 6:17 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> It still amazes me that pkg-config requires any other external library.
>> glib1 wasn't bad since it was shipped alongside it and had no other
>> deps, fairly lightweight. But switching to glib2 was just ridiculous.
>> All that
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:58:00 +0100 Bruce Dubbs
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Try this diff for configure.ac.
>> It helps. I can get through configure Ok, but I can't see a way to
>> get through make without dbus.
>
> Did you try in a Chapter 6 environment? I can'
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:19:47AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> Forgot to check what it installed : the libudev's in /lib look ok,
>> but the .pc says libdir=/usr/lib but again only has the .so.1
>> symlink to ../../lib/libudev.so.1.0.0. I assume a .so will also be
>> needed, s
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:19:47AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Forgot to check what it installed : the libudev's in /lib look ok,
> but the .pc says libdir=/usr/lib but again only has the .so.1
> symlink to ../../lib/libudev.so.1.0.0. I assume a .so will also be
> needed, so I've created one.
>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:48:47PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:32:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > > Is it worth me testing that this does work for xorg/Mesa ? Or are
> > > you concentrating on the patches to separate it ?
> >
> > Not sure.
On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:49:25 +0100
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Check these out:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/pkgconfiglite/
That looks good. It installs /usr/share/aclocal/pkg.m4 which we need.
"This is pkg-config-lite-0.26-1, based on pkg-config-0.26.
pkg-config-lite is based on pkg-confi
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:49:36PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/31/12 6:17 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> > It still amazes me that pkg-config requires any other external library.
> > glib1 wasn't bad since it was shipped alongside it and had no other
> > deps, fairly lightweight. But switchi
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:08:29PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> The idea of adding pkg-config 0.25 to LFS is a good suggestion. What do
>> others think? We might want to add it to Chapter 6 so we don't have to
>> do a workaround for glib in BLFS.
> Adding 0.25 sounds good.
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/31/12 6:17 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> It still amazes me that pkg-config requires any other external library.
>> glib1 wasn't bad since it was shipped alongside it and had no other
>> deps, fairly lightweight. But switching to glib2 was just ridiculous.
>> All that
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:08:29PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> The idea of adding pkg-config 0.25 to LFS is a good suggestion. What do
> others think? We might want to add it to Chapter 6 so we don't have to
> do a workaround for glib in BLFS.
>
>-- Bruce
Adding 0.25 sounds good. But
On 5/31/12 6:17 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> It still amazes me that pkg-config requires any other external library.
> glib1 wasn't bad since it was shipped alongside it and had no other
> deps, fairly lightweight. But switching to glib2 was just ridiculous.
> All that pkg-config is doing is parsin
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:32:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > Is it worth me testing that this does work for xorg/Mesa ? Or are
> > you concentrating on the patches to separate it ?
>
> Not sure. I've spent most of the day looking at configure.ac and can't
> seem to g
On 5/31/12 4:41 PM, James Robertson wrote:
> I have been watching this thread and it seems to have gone a bit dormant
> so maybe now is a good time to add my thoughts. First off - Jeremy,
> your contributions to this project continue to amaze me. Keep it up buddy.
Thanks James, :)
> 1. Adding
s...@slohj.org wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Date: Thu, May 31, 2012 4:51 pm
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:58:00 +0100
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Try t
On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:03:17 +0100
wrote:
> I've created a patch to systemd-183/{Makefile.am,configure.ac}.
>
> No dbus, pam, tcp-wrappers. Only kmod and blkid needed.
>
> It strips out everything but libudev, udevadmin, and udevd ( now called
> that again), rules, helpers, and tests.
>
> lib
On 06/01/2012 12:08 AM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/31/12 6:01 PM, Armin K. wrote:
>> pkg-config 0.26 uses glib2 and does not ship glib1 anymore. And since
>> LFS/BLFS tends to use latest stuff, glib 2.32 requires python for gdbus
>> stuff and libffi for some other stuff ... Do note that pkg-conf
On 5/31/12 6:10 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 22:38:21 +0100
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> Since when does glib require Python?
>
> I think Python's been a required dep since glib-2.32. It may be
> possible to build glib without python but it will need more than
> configure switch
On Thu, 31 May 2012 22:38:21 +0100
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Since when does glib require Python?
I think Python's been a required dep since glib-2.32. It may be
possible to build glib without python but it will need more than
configure switches.
> Are you using glib2? IIRC,
> pkg-config up unt
Armin K. wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 11:38 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> On 5/31/12 5:32 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
pkk-config
glib (required)
>> Since when does glib require Python? Are you using glib2? IIRC,
>> pkg-config up until recently shipped with glib1 sources and built that
>> in i
On 5/31/12 6:01 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> pkg-config 0.26 uses glib2 and does not ship glib1 anymore. And since
> LFS/BLFS tends to use latest stuff, glib 2.32 requires python for gdbus
> stuff and libffi for some other stuff ... Do note that pkg-config 0.25
> can be still built flawlessly. It can be i
Original Message
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report
From: Bruce Dubbs
Date: Thu, May 31, 2012 4:51 pm
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:58:00 +0100
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Try this diff for configure.ac.
>
> It help
On 05/31/2012 11:38 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/31/12 5:32 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>>> pkk-config
>>> glib (required)
>
> Since when does glib require Python? Are you using glib2? IIRC,
> pkg-config up until recently shipped with glib1 sources and built that
> in its own build system. I
On Thu, 31 May 2012 22:51:28 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Did you try in a Chapter 6 environment? I can't get it to work without
> pkg-config.
No, I think your make.sh is a better bet for an LFS Chapter 6 build.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linux
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:58:00 +0100
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Try this diff for configure.ac.
>
> It helps. I can get through configure Ok, but I can't see a way to get
> through make without dbus.
Did you try in a Chapter 6 environment? I can't get it to work without
pk
On 5/31/12 5:32 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> pkk-config
>> glib (required)
Since when does glib require Python? Are you using glib2? IIRC,
pkg-config up until recently shipped with glib1 sources and built that
in its own build system. In fact pkg-config's page says it uses
glib-1.2.10 - that
On Thu, 31 May 2012 22:20:25 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Well Dan, I've run into a problem with autoconf that I can't figure out
> how to solve. configure.ac has several lines like:
>
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES(KMOD, [libkmod >= 5])
>
> Now that's a reasonable check, but requires cfg.m4 which is inst
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:10:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> Failed to link:
>>>
>>> CC cdrom_id
>>> CC ata_id
>>> CC accelerometer
>>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ludev
>>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>> LD udevd failed
>>> root in chroot
On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:58:00 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Try this diff for configure.ac.
It helps. I can get through configure Ok, but I can't see a way to get
through make without dbus.
Andy
udev-only.patch
Description: Binary data
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:35:15PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> It gets through configure, but I haven't started to look at make yet.
>
> In any case, I'm not sure how to handle this in Chapter 6 yet.
> autoreconf requires pkg-config and we don't have that in LFS.
>
> At a
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Congratulations, you're off and running with the autotools!
Well Dan, I've run into a problem with autoconf that I can't figure out
how to solve. configure.ac has several lines like:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(KMOD, [libkmod >= 5])
Now that's a reasonable check, but requires cf
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:10:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > Failed to link:
> >
> > CC cdrom_id
> > CC ata_id
> > CC accelerometer
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ludev
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> > LD udevd failed
> > root in chroot /building/syst
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Jeremy Huntwork <
jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com> wrote:
> I've been holding back bringing this up on-list for a while because I
> intended to do the bulk of the work and then present a working system to
> the community for comment and review. I still intend to d
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:05:19 +0100
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>
>>> Here's an update. I forgot that [] are quotes in autoconf, so you
>>> usually end up using test instead. I still didn't test it works all
>>> the way, but I think configure should run.
>>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:49:05PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Now use systemd-lfs-2.patch
>>
>> The build remains:
>>
>>tar -xf systemd-183.tar.xz
>>cd systemd-183
>>patch -Np1 -i ../systemd-lfs-2.patch
>>sh make.sh
>>sh install.sh
>>
>
> Failed to link:
On 5/31/12, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:05:19 +0100
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> Here's an update. I forgot that [] are quotes in autoconf, so you
>> usually end up using test instead. I still didn't test it works all
>> the way, but I think configure should run.
>
> Withthis pat
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:49:05PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Now use systemd-lfs-2.patch
>
> The build remains:
>
>tar -xf systemd-183.tar.xz
>cd systemd-183
>patch -Np1 -i ../systemd-lfs-2.patch
>sh make.sh
>sh install.sh
>
Failed to link:
CC cdrom_id
CC ata_id
CC ac
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:05:19 +0100
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Here's an update. I forgot that [] are quotes in autoconf, so you
usually end up using test instead. I still didn't test it works all
the way, but I think configure should run.
Withthis patch automake fails with:
M
On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:05:19 +0100
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Here's an update. I forgot that [] are quotes in autoconf, so you
> usually end up using test instead. I still didn't test it works all
> the way, but I think configure should run.
Withthis patch automake fails with:
Makefile.am:1447: Ca
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:05:05AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> Here's an update. I forgot that [] are quotes in autoconf, so you
>> usually end up using test instead. I still didn't test it works all
>> the way, but I think configure should run.
>>
> Thanks. I'll take a loo
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:05:05AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> Here's an update. I forgot that [] are quotes in autoconf, so you
> usually end up using test instead. I still didn't test it works all
> the way, but I think configure should run.
>
Thanks. I'll take a look later.
> Allow me t
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 00:58:08 +0100
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> Actually, for some of us they *are* scary. I thought I was making
>> some progress (persuaded autoreconf to complete without errors using
>> the attached -A.patch), but then confi
On Thu, 31 May 2012 00:58:08 +0100
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Actually, for some of us they *are* scary. I thought I was making
> some progress (persuaded autoreconf to complete without errors using
> the attached -A.patch), but then configure went into an infinite
> loop spewing out '=no' lines. Tha
42 matches
Mail list logo
