Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> 2. How did you decide on that date and time ?
>
> Um. Yeah. I looked at what "ls -l" with no special configuration was
> telling me, and picked a time that was comfortably earlier than the
> mtime on aclocal.m4.
>
> This is probably completely unusabl
On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> It's a neat exercise to get it as small as possible. Not very critical
> though when RAM is $4/G, disk is $0.50/G, and even SSDs are down to $1/G.
Again, it's not just about disk space or available RAM. It's about (as
one example) the time it tak
Ken Moffat wrote:
> 2. How did you decide on that date and time ?
Um. Yeah. I looked at what "ls -l" with no special configuration was
telling me, and picked a time that was comfortably earlier than the
mtime on aclocal.m4.
This is probably completely unusable for people in other timezones; I
d
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 6/6/12 9:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>>
>>> (Major tangent now) My main motive for wanting to keep a very
>>> lightweight base system isn't so much size on disk as image size (a
>>> complete base system image). This is a somewhat important conside
On 6/6/12 9:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> (Major tangent now) My main motive for wanting to keep a very
>> lightweight base system isn't so much size on disk as image size (a
>> complete base system image). This is a somewhat important consideration
>> if you want to be ea
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> (Major tangent now) My main motive for wanting to keep a very
> lightweight base system isn't so much size on disk as image size (a
> complete base system image). This is a somewhat important consideration
> if you want to be easily transferring / duplicating / manipula
On 6/6/12 7:27 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> 1. It may encourage the people who are resurrecting the "drop
> autotools from LFS" suggestion :)
Too late, I'm already encouraged! :P
Seriously though, I really didn't intend to bring up that discussion
again. I only wanted to get rid of popt. :) But that
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:41:39PM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
> That doesn't explain why it gets run in this particular case though.
> We're editing configure, which should set its mtime to "right now",
> which should be later than configure.ac. Unless configure.ac is
> shipping with an mtime
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:48:34PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I apologize for the lack of proper in-reply-to headers for this, I
> don't normally read lfs-dev mailing list.
>
> Ken Moffit wrote at Thu May 31 17:18:25 MDT 2012:
[wearing my pedant's hat ]
s/fi/fa/ : in my case, the s
Hi,
I apologize for the lack of proper in-reply-to headers for this, I
don't normally read lfs-dev mailing list.
Ken Moffit wrote at Thu May 31 17:18:25 MDT 2012:
>> And:
>>
>> https://github.com/nenolod/pkgconf
>>
>
> Under development, but no releases and only a zip file for casual
> browsers
On 6/6/12 3:24 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> Surely if we can't find/link against host libs at this point, that flag
> is at best superfluous and at worst a potential danger as it may mask us
> being able to link against host libs when we shouldn't be able to?
Yep - agreed on all points. Superfluous.
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 14:57 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> If the user has been following the instructions correctly, it will be
> impossible to link against host libs at this point.
So, why then do you think
> We have the switch --disable-perl-regexp which is fine
Surely if we can't find/l
We have the switch --disable-perl-regexp which is fine, but the
explanation is no longer correct. It says:
This ensures that the grep program does not get linked against a Perl
Compatible Regular Expression (PCRE) library that may be present on the
host but will not be available once we enter t
2012/6/7 Bruce Dubbs :
> xinglp wrote:
>> When initramfs is used (as in the below URL), /run is aready mounted.
>> Then, if u save somethings under /run before switch_root,
>> u will not see them since /run is over mounted by mountvirtfs.
>>
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/
xinglp wrote:
> When initramfs is used (as in the below URL), /run is aready mounted.
> Then, if u save somethings under /run before switch_root,
> u will not see them since /run is over mounted by mountvirtfs.
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/initramfs.html
What happens
On 06-06-2012 13:17, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:57:21 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
[...]
> So, LFS uses Linus' non-RC mainline releases when they come out, followed by
> Greg K-H's stable releases up until Linus' next non-RC mainline release is
> made.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mat
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:57:21 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I suggest this topic be dropped as moot. The discussion doesn't add
> anything and we are agreed that today 3.4.1 is the latest stable version.
On the contrary, I think it's important that folks here understand a bit
about the kernel deve
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em qua, 6/6/12, Andrew Benton escreveu:
>
>> De: Andrew Benton
>> Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build
>> Para: lfs-dev
>> Data: Quarta-feira, 6 de Junho de 2012, 7:52
>> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 03:32:04 +0100
>> Fernando de Oliveira
>> wrote:
>
> [.
--- Em qua, 6/6/12, Andrew Benton escreveu:
> De: Andrew Benton
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] linux-3.4 needs patch to build
> Para: lfs-dev
> Data: Quarta-feira, 6 de Junho de 2012, 7:52
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 03:32:04 +0100
> Fernando de Oliveira
> wrote:
[...]
> > One can see in https://www.kernel.
Tobias Gasser wrote:
> in the current development the documentation for gawk was added by
> 'mkdir' and 'cp'. most other packages use 'install' when copying
> additional files.
>
> i already added the install statements for gawk 4.0 in my own scripts.
> so i'd like to know why you use copy instead
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 03:32:04 +0100
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I have built linux-3.4.1 in five machines. No problems, as with the
> unstable 3.4.0, which required a patch or sed for one of the machines.
>
> One can see in https://www.kernel.org/:
>
> "Latest Stable Kernel:
> Download
>
- Mail original -
> De: "Matt Burgess"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Juin 2012 08:58:30
> Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book?
>
> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 08:07 +0200, g@free.fr wrote:
>
> > Except I say there is more perl scripts as I reported only the on
in the current development the documentation for gawk was added by
'mkdir' and 'cp'. most other packages use 'install' when copying
additional files.
i already added the install statements for gawk 4.0 in my own scripts.
so i'd like to know why you use copy instead of install here. install
has th
23 matches
Mail list logo
