Re: [lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0

2012-07-01 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Fun fun fun. :-) Andrew Benton wrote: > Then an error due to a problem with gcc: > > /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(gethnamaddr.os): In > function `getanswer': > /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/gethnamaddr.c:180: undefined reference > to `__stack_chk_guard' > /mnt/lfs

Re: [lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0

2012-07-01 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 18:20 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: > I should confess that (as I'm a devotee of the Klingon School of > Programming) I didn't run any of the tests, so there may be some more > bugs under those rocks. Andy, Thanks very much for that effort. I'll work on integrating your fixe

Re: [lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0

2012-07-01 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andrew Benton wrote: > I hope you are all well. > > Glibc-2.16.0 has been released > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.16.0.tar.xz > The good news is that it no longer needs the patches that are in > current LFS. However, there are still some problems with it. Lots of work Andy. Thanks. I am

Re: [lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0

2012-07-01 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 06:20:52PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: > I should confess that (as I'm a devotee of the Klingon School of > Programming) I didn't run any of the tests, so there may be some more > bugs under those rocks. > > Andy By Her Noodliness, that looks fun! Or perhaps FFun with _tw

[lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0

2012-07-01 Thread Andrew Benton
I hope you are all well. Glibc-2.16.0 has been released http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.16.0.tar.xz The good news is that it no longer needs the patches that are in current LFS. However, there are still some problems with it. Firstly, the libgcc_s.so issue: /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_