Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Matt Burgess
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 20:44 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > it's a SATA drive. I'm pretty sure all of those show up as SCSI. That's what I thought as well, hence the sd* name, rather than hd*. > What does a udevadm info --attribute-walk on this device's /sys > directory show? Attached. Thanks!

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Matt Burgess wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:12 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >>> Checking against a slightly older build with udev 182, I only >>> have two entries in /dev/disk/by-path, /dev/hda (CD-ROM) and >>> /dev/sdc (which appears to be a leftover usb entry). >> Ah, no

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:12 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Checking against a slightly older build with udev 182, I only have two >> entries in /dev/disk/by-path, /dev/hda (CD-ROM) and /dev/sdc (which >> appears to be a leftover usb entry). > > Ah, now, there's a bit of a clue

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Matt Burgess
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:12 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Checking against a slightly older build with udev 182, I only have two > entries in /dev/disk/by-path, /dev/hda (CD-ROM) and /dev/sdc (which > appears to be a leftover usb entry). Ah, now, there's a bit of a clue. Plugging in a USB stick

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:42 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > >> If it is this, then it should be reasonably obvious from the udevadm >> test output I'd expect, but a full test would be something like: >> >> udevadm info -q env -p /sys/class/block/ The rule that should be fired i

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Armin K.
On 11/28/2012 08:25 PM, xinglp wrote: > > Thanks for your job. > > But will you also check why the ethernet interface not bring up on boot > issue. > I met this in vmware system with a vmxnet3 interface. but I can bring it > up by execute "modprobe vmxnet3". > This may also happen in other situatio

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread xinglp
2012/11/29 Matt Burgess > On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 03:25 +0800, xinglp wrote: > > > > But will you also check why the ethernet interface not bring up on > > boot issue. > > > > I met this in vmware system with a vmxnet3 interface. but I can bring > > it up by execute "modprobe vmxnet3". > > This may

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Matt Burgess
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 03:25 +0800, xinglp wrote: > > But will you also check why the ethernet interface not bring up on > boot issue. > > I met this in vmware system with a vmxnet3 interface. but I can bring > it up by execute "modprobe vmxnet3". > This may also happen in other situation, but not

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Matt Burgess
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:42 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > If it is this, then it should be reasonably obvious from the udevadm > test output I'd expect, but a full test would be something like: > > udevadm info -q env -p /sys/class/block/ OK, attached. That is from a fixed copy of the cfg.h fil

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread xinglp
2012/11/29 Bruce Dubbs > Matt Burgess wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:42 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > > > >> Hmm, did the Makefile changes for 196 handle the changes where upstream > >> made both blkid and kmod optional? We now need to add a couple new > >> defines if we want that to work r

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:42 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > >> Hmm, did the Makefile changes for 196 handle the changes where upstream >> made both blkid and kmod optional? We now need to add a couple new >> defines if we want that to work right, otherwise IMPORT{builtin}="blki

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Matt Burgess wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:42 +, Matt Burgess wrote: >>> On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:13 +0800, xinglp wrote: The Udev-196 only create "/dev/disk/by-path". >>> Confirmed. I'll take a look. >> >> Well, 2 hours later and I'm stumped. I've run 'udevad

Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-196 not create /dev/disk/by-{id, label, uuid, ...}, not bring up eth0.

2012-11-28 Thread Matt Burgess
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:42 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Hmm, did the Makefile changes for 196 handle the changes where upstream > made both blkid and kmod optional? We now need to add a couple new > defines if we want that to work right, otherwise IMPORT{builtin}="blkid" > won't actually do any