ugh even if I did have problems with the menu list
initially. I can't recall the last time I have looked at this or given it
any thought. Perhaps I should take a glance there again as I was ( past
tense ) doing some LFS work earlier this year on PowerPC and had
diligently documented each and e
little overhead required to build
them it would perhaps be best to leave them in the LFS process as is.
Dennis Clarke
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
/build/linux-2.6.24.4#
The problem is the FreeScale 52XX processor target and I'm looking
into it to see what the issue may be and I'll let you know what I
find.
Dennis Clarke
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think that the prevailing attitude here is rather anti GRUB2. Mostly
> > because development on it seems to focus on items perceived
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Sorry to drop in. I just wanted you to know that I was still out here
> > working on this little embedded PPC device and that I was getting to
> > the boot
; forcing myself to sit down and do it. I've been getting side tracked by
> a lot of other things.
Sorry to drop in. I just wanted you to know that I was still out here
working on this little embedded PPC device and that I was getting to
the boot loader issue .. eventually.
Just FYI.
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> If anyone has words of encouragement .. now would be a good time :-)
>
> Yeah, what Randy said. :) Anyway, yours is the type of testing, interest
> and feedback we need to keep this project alive and moving forward, so
> keep it coming. I know it&#x
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> If anyone has words of encouragement .. now would be a good time :-)
>
> Yeah, what Randy said. :) Anyway, yours is the type of testing, interest
> and feedback we need to keep this project alive and moving forward, so
> keep it coming. I know it&#x
> Dennis Clarke wrote these words on 04/19/08 17:29 CST:
>
>> If anyone has words of encouragement .. now would be a good time :-)
>
> 6 errors out of 42,000 tests ain't sh*t. Drive on, brother. Boot it
> up and see what happens. :-)
Should I be yelling "yeehaw&
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> So, bottom line for me is I don't see any errors other than the
>> math/test-double error in a 32bit multilib build. Both the 64bit
>> multilib and regular LFS (not JH branch) don't get any errors.
>
> Not really the bottom line (yet). Dennis is working on a PowerPC arch
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> So, bottom line for me is I don't see any errors other than the
>> math/test-double error in a 32bit multilib build. Both the 64bit
>> multilib and regular LFS (not JH branch) don't get any errors.
>
> Not really the bottom line (yet). Dennis is working on a PowerPC arch
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:53:27PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>> > Dennis Clarke wrote these words on 04/18/08 13:11 CST:
>> >> I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the
>> situation
>> >> is acceptable or not.
>&g
> Dennis Clarke wrote these words on 04/18/08 13:11 CST:
>> I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the situation
>> is acceptable or not.
>
> I cannot answer that either. You've received more errors than I
> have while building in several differe
I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the situation
is acceptable or not.
I build glibc as detailed and then run "make -k check " with output being
dumped via tee into glibc-check-log.
The make -k check ends with these lines :
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because o
is really about, to me, is
learning and seeing each piece along the journey.
Dennis Clarke
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>>> No Sir. This is all on PowerPC.
>
> Please take this thread to lfs-support.
Why ?
I don't think this is a support issue at all. More of a "could LFS be more
generic and open to other architectures" sort of thing.
Since leaping
>> to "successfully" compile the core LFS system are in the book. For the
>> making of make bison and flex... I would imagine it could be done without
> a
>> version of make already installed but it would probably be a lot of work.
>> I would guess it realy depends on how you start the job. Is thi
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Clarke
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 8:22 PM
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: SVN-20080403 : 5.6.1. Installation of Glibc failure
>
>
>&
> Loren Foret wrote:
>> More like linux from any distro.
> But I think the point is that some distros now come with, for example,
> dash as the default shell linked to /bin/sh, or as the OP apparently
> found, mawk as the default AWK interpreter. If LFS is to become "more
> than a book", it may be
..
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs/sources/build$ rm -rf foo
It may be reasonable to include a line or two for RISC (PPC/ARM etc) based
people that may get different output from compiling that dummy.c code.
-
Dennis Clarke
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfro
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> >> > You really need gawk, not mawk.
>> >>
>> >> Then ple
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 'mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: regular expression compile failed
>>
>> (bad class -- [], [^] or [)
>> /[^
>> mawk: scripts/gen-sorted.awk: line 19: syntax error at or near ]
>> mawk: scripts/gen-sorte
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Both attempts seem to be failing in similar way.
>>
>> Not sure what direction to take here.
>>
>> Any thoughts ?
>
> Well the CFLAGS thing shouldn't be necessary on powerpc, so your second
> approach was the better one
CET 2006
GNU Make 3.81
patch 2.5.9
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for powerpc-linux-gnu-thread-multi
GNU sed version 4.1.5
tar (GNU tar) 1.16
-
Dennis Clarke
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
n.b. : this is a ppc machine
and config.guess reports powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
I am attempting to follow the book and ran into a problem at 5.6.1
"Installation of Glibc". I tried twice with two different apporaches and
both fail in a similar way.
First attempt :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/
25 matches
Mail list logo
