Re: Glibc-2.3.6 sys/kd.h patch

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremy Byron
DJ Lucas wrote: > The glibc version in current LFS causes a build failure when compiling > xorg-6.9 and xorg-server-1.0.{1,2}. linux/types.h cannot be included > after sys/kd.h. The glibc-2.3.6-linux_types-1.patch just committed to > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc

Re: Recent toolchain breakage

2006-02-18 Thread Jeremy Byron
Dan Nicholson wrote: On 2/18/06, Jeremy Byron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I get the 'Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2,' 'attempt to open /lib/libc.so.6 succeeded,' and 'found ld-linux.so.2 at /lib/ld-linux.so.2' lines but not the '

Re: Recent toolchain breakage

2006-02-18 Thread Jeremy Byron
Matthew Burgess wrote: /tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: Sorry for the noise if this is my own doing, but the above line caught my eye. I just finished building the latest svn and noticed much the same after installing GCC in ch6. Running the san

Re: OOo2 Build Instructions Gimped

2005-11-29 Thread Jeremy Byron
Jeremy Byron wrote: still have the sed in the book for unxlngi6.mk. There are a few files that have this problem and unxlngi6.mk is no longer one of them so the Sorry, my bad.. unxlngi6.mk still has the problem but so does a few other files. No point fixing one and not the others and

OOo2 Build Instructions Gimped

2005-11-29 Thread Jeremy Byron
I tried building OOo2 again using the instructions in the book seeing as people are saying they have successful builds, but I don't see how they could without a lot of monkeying on their own. The bsh download is "..b4-src.tar.bz2" but the copy and decompression command references "..b4.tar.bz2

Re: module-init-tools-3.2.1

2005-11-21 Thread Jeremy Byron
Matthew Burgess wrote: Hi folks, There's a minor issue with the Makefile in this version. Essentially, if one uses the current '--prefix=""' then the following ends up in the logs: /bin/sh: line 0: [: =: unary operator expected That's caused by: Makefile:71: if [ $(prefix) = / ] In this c

Re: User lfs is more than optional.

2005-11-17 Thread Jeremy Byron
Emu wrote: I think that you have mis-understood William's email. From his email, I gather that he means that the commands set in 1 through 3 should be stated as 'Compulsory', ie if not used then you have a good chance of > I think as Linux becomes more mainstream, more people are going to

Re: User lfs is more than optional.

2005-11-17 Thread Jeremy Byron
William Zhou wrote: One of my friend started LFS several days ago and got an error when adjusting the toolchain( 5.7 ). The problem was that the gcc specs path was pointed to the host's one. It took me me a while to figure out that he ignored the creation of user lfs and thus the ~/.bashrc is no