> On Mon, 03 Mar2008 "Alexander E. Patrakov" wrote:
>
> Please reply to this message (please, limit this to the
> lfs-dev list only) and mark with "X" the items that apply.
> If the answer is not the same on your different Linux
> systems, write numbers of systems to which each
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Felix M. Palmen wrote:
> * USM Bish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070425 20:43]:
> >
> > OTOH, Err Code 450 is "Request mail action not taken:
> > mailbox unavailable" (which is perhaps what you mean by
> >
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:04:19PM +0300, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
[ some snipped ]
>
> The logic behind greylisting is rejecting email with a
> temporary error code -- which is defined in RFC 821 [1] and
> should be honored by the moderns MTA's-- so:
>
>- Any "well behaved" [2] M
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:20:34AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/26/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is the piping through 'head' really necessary ?
> > > 'type -p' alone seems to do the job ...
> >
> > Indeed, "head" isn't needed even if the binary is in
