On 08/28/2012 06:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>> I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
>>
>> I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
>> sysvinit packages.
>> I know that the way LFS insta
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
>
> I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
> sysvinit packages.
> I know that the way LFS installs packages the sysvinit package would
> over
On 08/28/2012 06:30 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 12:28 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
>>
>> I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
>> sysvinit packages.
>> I know that the way LFS installs packages the sys
On 08/29/2012 12:28 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
>
> I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
> sysvinit packages.
> I know that the way LFS installs packages the sysvinit package would
> over write the util-linux
I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
sysvinit packages.
I know that the way LFS installs packages the sysvinit package would
over write the util-linux but.
Which should really be kept?
--
http:
