Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

On 08/28/2012 05:26 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: >> On 08/28/2012 04:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Baho Utot wrote: On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: >> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Baho Utot wrote: On 08/28/2012 1

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

Baho Utot wrote: > On 08/28/2012 04:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Baho Utot wrote: >>> On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Baho Utot wrote: > On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Baho Utot wrote: >>> On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> If gentoo succee

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

On 08/28/2012 04:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: >> On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Baho Utot wrote: On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: >> On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> If gentoo succeeds then you have "just ano

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

Baho Utot wrote: > On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Baho Utot wrote: >>> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Baho Utot wrote: > On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > If gentoo succeeds then you have "just another package" > configure;make;make install ;)

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: >> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Baho Utot wrote: On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: If gentoo succeeds then you have "just another package" configure;make;make install ;) >>> I've always thought t

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

Baho Utot wrote: > On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Baho Utot wrote: >>> On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> If gentoo succeeds then you have "just another package" >>> configure;make;make install ;) >> I've always thought that configure (autotools) is overkill for linux >>

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: >> On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> If gentoo succeeds then you have "just another package" >> configure;make;make install ;) > I've always thought that configure (autotools) is overkill for linux > only packages, The kerne

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

Baho Utot wrote: > On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > If gentoo succeeds then you have "just another package" > configure;make;make install ;) I've always thought that configure (autotools) is overkill for linux only packages, The kernel doesn't use it. Why should systemd/udev or ut

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: >> FYI >> >> It appears that Gentoo has forked udev >> >> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7125718.html >> >> They want to produce a standalone udev >> >> Maybe you folks are interested? > It is worth watching. Our technique of usin

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

Baho Utot wrote: > FYI > > It appears that Gentoo has forked udev > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7125718.html > > They want to produce a standalone udev > > Maybe you folks are interested? It is worth watching. Our technique of using a custom Makefile is probably a little easier to mai

Re: [lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

Le 28/08/2012 14:32, Baho Utot a écrit : > FYI > > It appears that Gentoo has forked udev > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7125718.html > > They want to produce a standalone udev > > Maybe you folks are interested? > > Good news thx

[lfs-dev] FYI: udev Gentoo fork

FYI It appears that Gentoo has forked udev http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7125718.html They want to produce a standalone udev Maybe you folks are interested? -- Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of