xinglp wrote:
> 2014-04-05 19:50 GMT+08:00 Armin K. :
>> On 04/05/2014 05:50 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> xinglp wrote:
2014-04-05 11:04 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
> xinglp wrote:
>> When boot into systemd, got the below message:
>
> Lets work the problems one at a time.
>>>
>>
Armin K. wrote:
> On 04/05/2014 05:50 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> xinglp wrote:
>>> 2014-04-05 11:04 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
xinglp wrote:
> When boot into systemd, got the below message:
Lets work the problems one at a time.
>>
> [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf:25] Unknown g
2014-04-05 19:50 GMT+08:00 Armin K. :
> On 04/05/2014 05:50 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> xinglp wrote:
>>> 2014-04-05 11:04 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
xinglp wrote:
> When boot into systemd, got the below message:
Lets work the problems one at a time.
>>
> [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/syst
On 04/05/2014 05:50 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> xinglp wrote:
>> 2014-04-05 11:04 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
>>> xinglp wrote:
When boot into systemd, got the below message:
>>>
>>> Lets work the problems one at a time.
>
[/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf:25] Unknown group 'systemd-journal'.
>
> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 21:16:01 -0700
> From: Bryan Kadzban
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Major changes in -dev
>
>
>
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I did have a private email with a volunteer to write a hint. If I get
> > that, I&
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> However, if someone (like me...) *really really* doesn't want systemd,
>> and knows it from the get-go, shouldn't they avoid building all the other
>> junk like libacl / libattr / expat / *dbus* / etc., too? The current
>> list of packages that are only
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I did have a private email with a volunteer to write a hint. If I get
>> that, I'll add a note in the systemd section that points there.
>
> I saw a commit mail to -book that added the hint link.
>
> However, if someone (like me...) *really really* does
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I did have a private email with a volunteer to write a hint. If I get
> that, I'll add a note in the systemd section that points there.
I saw a commit mail to -book that added the hint link.
However, if someone (like me...) *really really* doesn't want systemd, and
knows it
xinglp wrote:
> 2014-04-05 10:59 GMT+08:00 William Harrington :
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:44 PM, xinglp wrote:
>>
>>> [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories.
>>> See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details.
>>
>> View the README in the systemd-xxx/ sou
xinglp wrote:
> 2014-04-05 11:04 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
>> xinglp wrote:
>>> When boot into systemd, got the below message:
>>
>> Lets work the problems one at a time.
>>> [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf:25] Unknown group 'systemd-journal'.
>>
>> Something else I forgot. What happens if you ad
2014-04-05 10:59 GMT+08:00 William Harrington :
>
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:44 PM, xinglp wrote:
>
>> [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories.
>> See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details.
>
> View the README in the systemd-xxx/ source directory or at /us
2014-04-05 10:59 GMT+08:00 William Harrington :
>
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:44 PM, xinglp wrote:
>
>> [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories.
>> See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details.
>
> View the README in the systemd-xxx/ source directory or at /us
2014-04-05 11:04 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
> xinglp wrote:
>> When boot into systemd, got the below message:
>
> Lets work the problems one at a time.
>
>> [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories.
>> See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details.
>>
xinglp wrote:
> When boot into systemd, got the below message:
Lets work the problems one at a time.
> [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories.
> See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details.
> ---split---
> root [ ~ ]# systemctl status
On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:44 PM, xinglp wrote:
> [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories.
> See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details.
View the README in the systemd-xxx/ source directory or at /usr/share/
systemd-xxx/README and make sure your kernel op
When boot into systemd, got the below message:
[FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories.
See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details.
---split---
root [ ~ ]# systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service -
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 08:35:34PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > I'm now sufficiently interested by this to try a _minimal_ build
> > (i.e. LFS and not much else - many of the things I normally build
> > before rebooting have their own local bootscripts, which will
> > pro
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:44:22PM +0200, Denis Mugnier wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 18:41, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Denis Mugnier wrote:
> >>
> >> It is possible to integrate eudev on the BLFS book to provide a solution
> >> without the systemd package?
> > Not without changing the flow. I understand the
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:49:14AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> >> The scripts to reconfigure are in /usr/local/sbin and are named
> >> set-systemd and set-sysv. I recommend re-reading Chapter 7 as there are
> >> a lot of changes there.
> >
> > Why /usr/local ? They will b
On 04/04/2014 18:41, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Denis Mugnier wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 04/04/2014 02:02, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> I'm sorry to see eudev disappear from the book after its brief
>>> appearance, but more power to your elbow for providing the two
>>> alternative init systems.
>> I'm sorry too.
Ken Moffat wrote:
>> The scripts to reconfigure are in /usr/local/sbin and are named
>> set-systemd and set-sysv. I recommend re-reading Chapter 7 as there are
>> a lot of changes there.
>
> Why /usr/local ? They will be an intrinsic part of LFS if this all
> works out. Some of us occasionall
Denis Mugnier wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 04/04/2014 02:02, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>I'm sorry to see eudev disappear from the book after its brief
>> appearance, but more power to your elbow for providing the two
>> alternative init systems.
> I'm sorry too.
>
> It is possible to integrate eudev on the BLFS
Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> -- Bruce
> Built using jhalfs, with all final testsuites:
> Errors (FWIW):
> - glibc : 2 errors (+ 2 ignored), seems as usual
> - coreutils : 1 error (test/misc/nohup)
> - bash (a few, not sure, seems similar to usual)
> - bc (a few, similar to usual)
> - systemd : 2
Hi
On 04/04/2014 02:02, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm sorry to see eudev disappear from the book after its brief
> appearance, but more power to your elbow for providing the two
> alternative init systems.
I'm sorry too.
It is possible to integrate eudev on the BLFS book to provide a solution
withou
Le 04/04/2014 00:11, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> I've committed a major change to the -dev version of LFS.
>
> The new version installs systemd and System V side-by-side with the
> ability to reconfigure and come up in the other system.
>
> The scripts to reconfigure are in /usr/local/sbin and are name
akhiezer wrote:
>
> SVN-20140403 :
> --
> * Appendix C. 'Dependencies':
> - still got an entry for eudev.
> - no entry for systemd or d-bus.
Fixed at revision 10521.
> * Preface, 'v. Rationale for Packages in the Book':
> - still to be updated for newly added/removed pkgs sin
akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:11:10 -0500
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: [lfs-dev] Major changes in -dev
>>
>> I've committed a major change to the -dev version of LFS.
>>
>> The new versio
xinglp wrote:
> 2014-04-04 6:11 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
>> I'm sure there are still latent bugs in the current commit, whether they
>> be in scripts, build instructions, or text. Please test this out and
>> let me know of needed changes.
>
> set-systemd line 7
> ln -sfvn $(tool}-systemd /sbin/$
xinglp wrote:
> Some error messages during boot，sysv
> Mounting virtual file systems: /runcp: cannot stat
> '/lib/udev/devices/*': No such file or directory
Hmm. I didn't see this. The command is:
cp -a /lib/udev/devices/* /dev
and I do not appear to have the /lib/udev/devices directory at al
> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:11:10 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: [lfs-dev] Major changes in -dev
>
> I've committed a major change to the -dev version of LFS.
>
> The new version installs systemd and System V side-by-side with
2014-04-04 6:11 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
> I'm sure there are still latent bugs in the current commit, whether they
> be in scripts, build instructions, or text. Please test this out and
> let me know of needed changes.
set-systemd line 7
ln -sfvn $(tool}-systemd /sbin/${tool}
should be
ln -sfv
2014-04-04 6:11 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs :
> I've committed a major change to the -dev version of LFS.
>
> The new version installs systemd and System V side-by-side with the
> ability to reconfigure and come up in the other system.
>
> The scripts to reconfigure are in /usr/local/sbin and are named
>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> As to the size in the foreword - I think you are probably correct.
Perhaps you mean the Preface. The first place I see size mentioned is
in the target architectures. My, things gave grown since LFS 6.5.
The size for 7.5 (64-bit) is 1.5G. We have increased the minimum
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK so LFS doesn't use anymore sysvinit, but Systemd.
Incorrect. You have a choice. We install both and you can test them
out and choose the one you like best.
I thought the book
> 9ould use an approach like the CLFS one: one chapter if you use Systemd;
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:11:10PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I've committed a major change to the -dev version of LFS.
>>
>> The new version installs systemd and System V side-by-side with the
>> ability to reconfigure and come up in the other system.
>>
>
> I'm sorry to se
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 02:46:13AM +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK so LFS doesn't use anymore sysvinit, but Systemd. I thought the book
> 9ould use an approach like the CLFS one: one chapter if you use Systemd;
> one if sysvinit (in CLFS: if you chroot; if you reboot). Given tha
Hi,
OK so LFS doesn't use anymore sysvinit, but Systemd. I thought the book
9ould use an approach like the CLFS one: one chapter if you use Systemd;
one if sysvinit (in CLFS: if you chroot; if you reboot). Given that the
choice is at runtime or config time, and not at install time, I think
the
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:11:10PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've committed a major change to the -dev version of LFS.
>
> The new version installs systemd and System V side-by-side with the
> ability to reconfigure and come up in the other system.
>
I'm sorry to see eudev disappear from the
I've committed a major change to the -dev version of LFS.
The new version installs systemd and System V side-by-side with the
ability to reconfigure and come up in the other system.
The scripts to reconfigure are in /usr/local/sbin and are named
set-systemd and set-sysv. I recommend re-reading
39 matches
Mail list logo
