On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention:
>>
>> pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name
>> dash patchrev3.patch
>>
>>
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention:
>>
>> pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name
>> dash patchrev3.patch
>>
>> That is, the name should be:
>>
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention:
>
> pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name
> dash patchrev3.patch
>
> That is, the name should be:
>
> thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng_1.5-
Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention:
pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name
dash patchrev3.patch
That is, the name should be:
thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng_1.5-1.patch
not
thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng-1.5-1.patch
This is not a big de