Re: [lfs-dev] manpage of ifup is not the manpage format.

I've changed the FONT="lat1-16 -m 8859-1" . With only UNICODE=yes , it not works well. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] manpage of ifup is not the manpage format.

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:41:36AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > xinglp wrote: > > > > Show them in hex > > mkdir -v aaa|view - -c '%!xxd' > > 000: 6d6b 6469 723a 2063 7265 6174 6564 2064 mkdir: created d > > 010: 6972 6563 746f 7279 20e2 8098 6161 61e2 irectory ...aaa. > > 020: 8099 0

Re: [lfs-dev] manpage of ifup is not the manpage format.

xinglp wrote: > 2012/4/19 Bruce Dubbs : >> xinglp wrote: >>> 在 2012年4月11日 下午11:13，Bruce Dubbs 写道： xinglp wrote: > There are somethings else in other manpages, I think they are some > kinds of format. No, it's ascii, not the more common troff format. That's valid but just d

Re: [lfs-dev] manpage of ifup is not the manpage format.

2012/4/19 Bruce Dubbs : > xinglp wrote: >> 在 2012年4月11日 下午11:13，Bruce Dubbs 写道： >>> xinglp wrote: There are somethings else in other manpages, I think they are some kinds of format. >>> No, it's ascii, not the more common troff format.  That's valid but just >>> does >>> not have things

Re: [lfs-dev] manpage of ifup is not the manpage format.

xinglp wrote: > 在 2012年4月11日 下午11:13，Bruce Dubbs 写道： >> xinglp wrote: >>> There are somethings else in other manpages, I think they are some >>> kinds of format. >> No, it's ascii, not the more common troff format. That's valid but just does >> not have things like bold available. > Yes, I know

Re: [lfs-dev] manpage of ifup is not the manpage format.

在 2012年4月11日 下午11:13，Bruce Dubbs 写道： > xinglp wrote: >> There are somethings else in other manpages, I think they are some >> kinds of format. > > No, it's ascii, not the more common troff format.  That's valid but just does > not have things like bold available. Yes, I know it. But on a local con

Re: [lfs-dev] manpage of ifup is not the manpage format.

xinglp wrote: > There are somethings else in other manpages, I think they are some > kinds of format. No, it's ascii, not the more common troff format. That's valid but just does not have things like bold available. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http:

[lfs-dev] manpage of ifup is not the manpage format.

There are somethings else in other manpages, I think they are some kinds of format. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page