Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> The question is how the book should handle this. Valid options:
> 
> 1) Upgrade nano to 1.3.9 and briefly explain the reason on its page.
> Don't add anything to the "locale related issues" page because the issue
> is completely resolved.
> 
> 2) Keep both nano-1.2.5 and nano-1.3.9 as separate pages,
[...]

1), definitely.
Even if I don't use nano at the moment.
-- 
Nico

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to