Robert Connolly wrote:
> With HLFS I'm leaning towards bootstrapping the chroot toolchain. It's how
> the
> GCC developers would want it.
You cannot speak for the GCC developers, so please don't. IMHO you are WAY
off the mark anyway.
> I don't know if LFS has also considered the top level make
With HLFS I'm leaning towards bootstrapping the chroot toolchain. It's how the
GCC developers would want it.
I don't know if LFS has also considered the top level makefile build method
being promoted by GCC/GNU, so that GCC and Binutils are built together in the
same tree. The difference here i
