Matthew Burgess wrote:
I'll be doing a 6.1 pre-release tomorrow night
(~19:00-20:00 UTC).
Well, the astute amongst you will have noticed this never happened!
Archaic and I are busy doing a final review of the text. This should be
all done by tomorrow night...honest!
Given that slippage, I'
Archaic wrote:
Those are contradictory. 1586 required command changes.
Of course it did. I was just testing you :) Errm, what can I say?
Whoops :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> There are two bugs remaining to be fixed (1582 and 1586) which are
> simply textual changes.
> Editors, I think it goes without saying, strictly no package upgrades or
> command changes now please.
Those are contradictory. 15
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Justin, could you spin final package tarballs based on what's
currently listed in chapter 3 of the testing branch please?
Hi Matt,
Sure, just double-checked all the versions and patches. A tarball and
md5sums has been generated and should be synced on all servers by t
El Lunes, 27 de Junio de 2005 19:53, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> Hi folks,
>
> After a very long delay [1] it looks as if we really are nearly there.
> There are two bugs remaining to be fixed (1582 and 1586) which are
> simply textual changes. I'll be doing a 6.1 pre-release tomorrow night
> (~19
Hi folks,
After a very long delay [1] it looks as if we really are nearly there.
There are two bugs remaining to be fixed (1582 and 1586) which are
simply textual changes. I'll be doing a 6.1 pre-release tomorrow night
(~19:00-20:00 UTC). I'd like to get 6.1 out this weekend, though I
reali
