Arthur Radley wrote:
> LFS 7.5-rc1 6.2.3. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems
>
> Re: mkdir -pv $LFS/$(readlink $LFS/dev/shm)
>
> If the host's /dev/shm is a symbolic link to /run/shm, then "readlink
> $LFS/dev/shm" will output "/run/shm". mkdir appar
On 02/20/2014 03:50 PM, Arthur Radley wrote:
> LFS 7.5-rc1 6.2.3. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems
>
> Re: mkdir -pv $LFS/$(readlink $LFS/dev/shm)
>
> If the host's /dev/shm is a symbolic link to /run/shm, then "readlink
> $LFS/dev/shm" will output "/
LFS 7.5-rc1 6.2.3. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems
Re: mkdir -pv $LFS/$(readlink $LFS/dev/shm)
If the host's /dev/shm is a symbolic link to /run/shm, then "readlink
$LFS/dev/shm" will output "/run/shm". mkdir apparently ignores the extra
forward slash and creat
Joe wrote:
> If those *mount points* exist in /dev
> then they will exist in $LFS/dev after the mount --bind.
Alex wrote:
> So you want to mkdir ${LFS}/dev _before_ the mount --bind, and mkdir
> ${LFS}/dev/{pts,shm} _after_ the mount --bind.
(when the mount points do not exist - for whatever reaso
I
guess you are then going to mount --bind over the top of it afterwards,
which will cover up ${LFS}/dev/{pts,shm}.
>
> I would use this in place of what is
> in 6.2.3. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems.
> I want to take care of the mount error that is
> possible by resetting
Peter wrote:
> I would use this in place of what is
> in 6.2.3. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems.
> I want to take care of the mount error that is
> possible by resetting the build from
> scratch without a reboot because the
> book does not explicitly create pts and shm
>
Sorry, I was a bit sloppy in the last message.
My question summarized - Is the following
command OK?
mkdir -pv ${LFS}/{dev{/pts,/shm},proc,sys}
I would use this in place of what is
in 6.2.3. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems.
I want to take care of the mount error that is
possible by res
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:51:47PM +, Peter Ennis wrote:
> Is it OK to explicitly create
> dev/pts and dev/shm before mount --bind ?
> This will fix my situation.
No. This will definitely not help, as they will be covered by mount
--bind. You may want to look at the --bind option in `man 8 mo
M.Canales.es linuxfromscratch.org> writes:
>
> No except if you find that it is a real bug and it may be reproducible by an
> editor.
>
Below is an example of repeating mount --bind and
getting two listings. I have experience where
running the commands repeatedly will add numerous
duplicate m
El Miércoles, 9 de Agosto de 2006 20:53, Peter Ennis escribió:
> 1. Does the mount --bind take care of this normally
> with cut and paste?
Yes, after the "mount -bind ..." $LFS/dev/{pts,shm} must exist.
> 3. Is there a reason not to explicitly create
> /dev/pts and /dev/shm under $LFS ?
Due th
On 8/9/06, Peter Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Does the mount --bind take care of this normally
with cut and paste?
Yes. If you have a proper setup on your host (we could be more careful
about this), it will have /dev/{pts,shm}. When you bind /dev to
$LFS/dev, it brings the whole structu
LFS 6.2
6.2.3. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems
I reformatted my test system to do another
install and get the following errors:
Command Line:
=
lfs:~$ sudo mount -vt devpts devpts ${LFS}/dev/pts
mount: mount point /mnt/lfs/dev/pts does not exist
Scripted:
=
devpts on
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:39:41PM +0100, Kev Buckley wrote:
>
> I am aware that the user and group "issue" was done to death a while
> back resulting in the chosen set now in the book, however, although
> realising that "the numbers dont matter so much" because you'ld
> normally look them up star
I am aware that the user and group "issue" was done to death a while
back resulting in the chosen set now in the book, however, although
realising that "the numbers dont matter so much" because you'ld
normally look them up starting from a name anyway, I did start
wondering, when reaching section 6
14 matches
Mail list logo
