On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> I hope not. Sometimes I am out of town and want to catch up. I don't
> like or have a notebook computer and sometimes am limited to using
> someone else's machine, perhaps with some other operating system. Being
> able to do a sub
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> NNTP stuff has caused us a number of problems over time. It therefore
> might just be more economical to ditch the whole thing. Watch this space!
I hope not. Sometimes I am out of town and want to catch up. I don't
like or have a notebook computer and sometimes am lim
Joachim Beckers wrote:
What do you mean with "a while"? Is it like a whole week or just a
couple of hours?
Depends on whether my planned approach works. If I've thought about
things correctly, it should be a couple of hours. Having said that, the
NNTP stuff has caused us a number of proble
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
>> Is there any realistic expectation that the facility to write to the
>> lists via the NNTP service will be fixed? There is also a suggestion
>> that it might be withdrawn.
>
> I came up with a plan that may well have fixed NNTP, but have bee
accurately reflect the true situation. My current draft reads:
>
> "All the mailing lists hosted at linuxfromscratch.org are also
> accessible via the NNTP server. All messages posted to a mailing list
> will be copied to its correspondent newsgroup. Note, however, that as
> this
Richard A Downing wrote:
Is there any realistic expectation that the facility to write to the
lists via the NNTP service will be fixed? There is also a suggestion
that it might be withdrawn.
I came up with a plan that may well have fixed NNTP, but have been too
busy to get around to it. As i
reads:
"All the mailing lists hosted at linuxfromscratch.org are also
accessible via the NNTP server. All messages posted to a mailing list
will be copied to its correspondent newsgroup. Note, however, that as
this is written, it is not possible to write to the mailing lists via
the NNTP se
