Ag Hatzim([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:41:33AM +0200:
> Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:45:09AM -0600:
>
> In addition the build (SVN-20051127) was able to reproduce itself.
> And while i had some failures whith some blfs packages with
> gcc-4.0.2/glibc-2.3-
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:45:09AM -0600:
> Hi all,
>
> In the SVN Chapter 6 Glibc instructions, it says to expect math test
> failures during the test suite. I've always seen these before with
> GCC-4.0.x, however, the latest build using Glibc-2.3.6 and GCC-4.0.2
>
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> If Dan is using a P3, then I would not expect him to see the failure.
I should have said:
I would not expect him to see the failure, whether or not it got fixed
for the Athlon XPs.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailma
On 11/23/05, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > That includes -O3 -march=pentium3 optimization.
>
> Looks like you use a P3 then? Those definitely did *not* show the
> failure before.
Good to know. I wasn't aware that the math failures were architecture
dependent
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
>> What CPU do you use? They only ever showed up on Athlon XP CPUs,
>> IIRC (though it is possible that other CPUs did cause a failure; I
>> know my Athlon XPs caused it).
>
> They don't show up with my Athlon XP 2400+ - my test results are
> exact
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 09:52:11PM +, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> They don't show up with my Athlon XP 2400+ - my test results are exactly
> the same as Randy's.
Same here on my 2400+.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I've never gotten the math test failures in LFS (haven't been around
long, though).
What CPU do you use? They only ever showed up on Athlon XP CPUs, IIRC
(though it is possible that other CPUs did cause a failure; I know my
Athlon XPs caused it).
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I've never gotten the math test failures in LFS (haven't been around
> long, though).
What CPU do you use? They only ever showed up on Athlon XP CPUs, IIRC
(though it is possible that other CPUs did cause a failure; I know my
Athlon XPs caused it).
> That includes -O3 -ma
On 11/23/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But right now the book says to *expect* the math errors, which
> both you and I do not see.
Agreed about "expect to see". I don't think that's appropriate wording.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 11/23/05 13:48 CST:
> Last week or so I build SVN alphabetical from Jeremy's
> repo using glibc-2.3.6, gcc-4.0.2 and binutils-2.16.1. CFLAGS,
> CXXFLAGS, LDFLAGS unset. Here's the errors from glibc:
>
> make[2]: [/tools/src/build/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] E
On 11/23/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the SVN Chapter 6 Glibc instructions, it says to expect math test
> failures during the test suite. I've always seen these before with
> GCC-4.0.x, however, the latest build using Glibc-2.3.6 and GCC-4.0.2
> doesn't seem to exh
Randy McMurchy wrote:
If these errors are not being seen any longer, perhaps the book
should be updated?
No question about that. Filed as bug #1659
It seems you're on a roll today, Randy. Thanks :)
--
Gerard Beekmans
/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
