Ryan Oliver wrote:
...
Strange. I realized now that there seems to be a serious time
lag somewhere. Your message just arrived in my mail box, while
I see it's dated 050721... Oh, well.
J.O.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubs
Ryan Oliver wrote:
...
You may want to consider using the cross-lfs book ( in development ) or
the cross-lfs scripts (from svn) if attempting a bi-arch x86_64 build
from a 32bit OS.
The book is (IIRC) under http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork ,
the scripts are in svn.linuxfromscratch.org
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:15 +0200, Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
> Since the subject became increasingly inaccurate, and since my
> rate of hickups to installed packages indicates that this will
> not be my last question, I swap in another thread...
>
> Now reading the book more carefully, I notice tha
Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
I noticed that the
find ${GCC_INCLUDEDIR} -xtype d -exec rm -rf \{} \;
in the toolchain adjustment in 5.7 removed a lot of things,
including ${GCC_INCLUDEDIR} itself. I don't know if this is
supposed to happen, but the next package (Tcl) failed
Ok, I saw this mentio
I noticed that the
find ${GCC_INCLUDEDIR} -xtype d -exec rm -rf \{} \;
in the toolchain adjustment in 5.7 removed a lot of things,
including ${GCC_INCLUDEDIR} itself. I don't know if this is
supposed to happen, but the next package (Tcl) failed
spectacularly, so I started over again, and did n
Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
I have /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 replaced by /tools/lib64...,
but should /lib/ld-linux.so.2 be replaced by /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2
or by /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2? (Note that
/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 does not exist, but I *do* want to end up
with a combined 32/
