On 8/28/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:01:36 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:28:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Are there any objections to releasing what is in branches/6.3 tomorrow
> >> night as 6.3 fina
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:01:36 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:28:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Are there any objections to releasing what is in branches/6.3 tomorrow
>> night as 6.3 final?
>
> We have to let go at some point. Now seems a decent eno
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:28:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Are there any objections to releasing what is in branches/6.3 tomorrow
> night as 6.3 final?
We have to let go at some point. Now seems a decent enough time.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://w
As far as I know, all outstanding issues for 6.3 are complete. I'd
prefer not to do the new bash patches quite yet.
The changes from -rc2 are:
man-db fixes patch
Linux-2.6.22.5
shadow URL
minor bash testsuite fix
LFS-Bootscripts-20070813
acknowledgements page
If we don't get this out soon, we w