Re: Ready for 6.3?

2007-08-28 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/28/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:01:36 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:28:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Are there any objections to releasing what is in branches/6.3 tomorrow > >> night as 6.3 fina

Re: Ready for 6.3?

2007-08-28 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:01:36 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:28:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Are there any objections to releasing what is in branches/6.3 tomorrow >> night as 6.3 final? > > We have to let go at some point. Now seems a decent eno

Re: Ready for 6.3?

2007-08-27 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:28:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Are there any objections to releasing what is in branches/6.3 tomorrow > night as 6.3 final? We have to let go at some point. Now seems a decent enough time. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://w

Ready for 6.3?

2007-08-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
As far as I know, all outstanding issues for 6.3 are complete. I'd prefer not to do the new bash patches quite yet. The changes from -rc2 are: man-db fixes patch Linux-2.6.22.5 shadow URL minor bash testsuite fix LFS-Bootscripts-20070813 acknowledgements page If we don't get this out soon, we w