On 10/26/10, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
>
> I was wondering: one of the things that gives me a headache when installing
> LFS, is that there is no generic package management system that you can use
> to install the basic system software (Chapter 6). I know, that the point of
> lfs is
On 10/26/10 12:03, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
>
> I was wondering: one of the things that gives me a headache when
> installing LFS, is that there is no generic package management system
> that you can use to install the basic system software (Chapter 6). I
> know, that the point o
Michael Schmidt wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
>
> I was wondering: one of the things that gives me a headache when installing
> LFS, is that there is no generic package management system that you can use
> to install the basic system software (Chapter 6). I know, that the point of
> lfs is to built ev
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:03, Michael Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
>
> I was wondering: one of the things that gives me a headache when installing
> LFS, is that there is no generic package management system that you can use
> to install the basic system software (Chapter 6). I know, that the
Hi everybody!
I was wondering: one of the things that gives me a headache when installing
LFS, is that there is no generic package management system that you can use
to install the basic system software (Chapter 6). I know, that the point of
lfs is to built everything from scratch, but that not n
