Hi folks,
There's a minor issue with the Makefile in this version.
Essentially, if one uses the current '--prefix=' then the following
ends up in the logs:
/bin/sh: line 0: [: =: unary operator expected
That's caused by:
Makefile:71: if [ $(prefix) = / ]
In this case, $(prefix) will
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:22:27PM +, Matthew Burgess wrote:
I've a preference for option 3) in the long-term but put 2) in the book
for the time being until the patch for 2 is submitted, accepted and in
an upstream release.
Since option 3, or some other fix decided upon by upstream is
El Lunes, 21 de Noviembre de 2005 22:22, Matthew Burgess escribió:
3) Change the Makefile to do the following test instead:
if [ $(prefix) = / -o $(prefix) = ];
Try this:
if [ x$(prefix) = x/ ]
That is recommended way to test varaibles when you aren't sure that it allways
have an asigned
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Hi folks,
There's a minor issue with the Makefile in this version.
Essentially, if one uses the current '--prefix=' then the following
ends up in the logs:
/bin/sh: line 0: [: =: unary operator expected
That's caused by:
Makefile:71: if [ $(prefix) = / ]
In this
Jeremy Byron wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
3) Change the Makefile to do the following test instead:
if [ $(prefix) = / -o $(prefix) = ];
This should still give the 'unary operator expected' message, I would
think.
Nope, for once I did actually test this before proposing it :-)
In order
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Lunes, 21 de Noviembre de 2005 22:22, Matthew Burgess escribió:
3) Change the Makefile to do the following test instead:
if [ $(prefix) = / -o $(prefix) = ];
Try this:
if [ x$(prefix) = x/ ]
That is recommended way to test varaibles when you aren't sure that it
