This brought up a philosophical debate in my mind. If the book mentions
moving the sources, but then proceeds to move them to a directory where
only root can write, ISTM that this can be mis-interpreted as you have
to download sources as root to be able to save them. If someone has to
be
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:32:53PM +0100, Kev Buckley wrote:
Hope that makes sense.
Everything you said made perfect sense. However, all the sources
unpacked are over 1 GB. Considering how LFS only needs 1.3 GB to build,
your method would basically double the required partition space and
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 00:29, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Archaic wrote these words on 06/07/05 23:55 CST:
Okay, carefully reading your original message, with my head clear
(full of vodka, albeit), I know see the problem.
know see it? Randy! You're ruining our reputation! Must be the
vodka ;)
Archaic wrote:
I suggest:
The reason for this is that the programs in /tools are no longer needed.
Since they are no longer needed you can delete the /tools directory if
so desired or tar it up and keep it to build another final system.
Look good to me.
I suggest:
Removing /tools will also
from
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html
#
From now on, when reentering the chroot environment after exiting, use
the following modified chroot command:
chroot $LFS /usr/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 12:56, Archaic wrote:
from
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html
#
From now on, when reentering the chroot environment after exiting, use
the following modified chroot command:
chroot $LFS /usr/bin/env -i \
El Martes, 7 de Junio de 2005 19:56, Archaic escribió:
from
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.ht
ml
The redaction changes look fine to me.
This brought up a philosophical debate in my mind. If the book mentions
moving the sources, but then proceeds to
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:08:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My suggestion is to leave that part completely out of chapter 6 and put
it in as an appendix to the book. It is extremely confusing after you
do that and then go to chapter 7.
Did you read my changes? If so please re-reply
Archaic wrote these words on 06/07/05 23:30 CST:
Suggestions? Comments? Feedback is requested, please.
Is there any way you can perhaps make a short paragraph of what
you are suggesting? I read your original email earlier today, but
it was simply too much to think about. I got lost.
So, I just
