Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Douglas R. Reno wrote: Alright we have the same motherboard. Do you remember how you managed to do that? I think I need Windows anyway though, as I get paid for making videos about gaming and I use Sony Vegas 11 and Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0, and I cannot get those to run under something like Wine.

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Douglas R. Reno
Alright we have the same motherboard. Do you remember how you managed to do that? I think I need Windows anyway though, as I get paid for making videos about gaming and I use Sony Vegas 11 and Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0, and I cannot get those to run under something like Wine. I will install LFS on it

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Douglas R. Reno wrote: My Core i7 is a 6 core with Hyperthreading as well. I am forced to run Windows though because the monitoring tools and software provided by the motherboard is needed for the Chipset to function properly, and that is stupid as. The machine also has a forced UEFI BIOS (an ASU

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Douglas R. Reno
My Core i7 is a 6 core with Hyperthreading as well. I am forced to run Windows though because the monitoring tools and software provided by the motherboard is needed for the Chipset to function properly, and that is stupid as. The machine also has a forced UEFI BIOS (an ASUS one) and there is no wa

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Douglas R. Reno wrote: My current host has a 6GB of RAM and a Core 2 Quad Q9650, and my brand new box has a Core i7 with 16GB of RAM, so I am hoping to see a difference. Building with a 10Minute SBU time is painful when the machine cannot be used while something like Qt4 or Firefox is being compi

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Douglas R. Reno
My current host has a 6GB of RAM and a Core 2 Quad Q9650, and my brand new box has a Core i7 with 16GB of RAM, so I am hoping to see a difference. Building with a 10Minute SBU time is painful when the machine cannot be used while something like Qt4 or Firefox is being compiled. My plan is to do my

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:22:46AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > Alright I understand now. Thanks Bruce! I have noticed that it all depends > on whats running on the system at hand as well. > > Ken, I am building on a physical laptop as well now (I will be away from > home for a week and I still

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Douglas R. Reno
Alright I understand now. Thanks Bruce! I have noticed that it all depends on whats running on the system at hand as well. Ken, I am building on a physical laptop as well now (I will be away from home for a week and I still want to work on stuff), so I will see what it is after that. The VM is rea

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:58:33AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Douglas R. Reno wrote: > >Hi Everyone, > > > >As part of my most recent build (A LFS 7.7 on VMWare, 64bit for BLFS > >Development), I decided to run the Automake test suite. I normally do not > >do this, however I figured I would try it

Re: [lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Douglas R. Reno wrote: Hi Everyone, As part of my most recent build (A LFS 7.7 on VMWare, 64bit for BLFS Development), I decided to run the Automake test suite. I normally do not do this, however I figured I would try it out. I ran "make -j4 check" and I still ended up with 60 SBUs (6 hours at 1

[lfs-dev] Automake SBUs may be incorrect

2015-03-18 Thread Douglas R. Reno
Hi Everyone, As part of my most recent build (A LFS 7.7 on VMWare, 64bit for BLFS Development), I decided to run the Automake test suite. I normally do not do this, however I figured I would try it out. I ran "make -j4 check" and I still ended up with 60 SBUs (6 hours at 10 minutes per SBU). This