Re: [lfs-dev] Has i686 support dropped in (B)LFS?

2018-01-31 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: On 31/01/2018 19:55, Thomas Trepl wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2018, 19:16 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie: You may want to try adding two flags to binutils' configure: --enable-64-bit-bfd --enable-targets=x86-64 --enable-targets=x86_64 results in a configure error b

Re: [lfs-dev] Has i686 support dropped in (B)LFS?

2018-01-31 Thread Alain Toussaint
> In binutils doc, namely > https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.29/as/i386_002dOptions.html > > > configure --help doesn't show those switches. For most packages like gcc, you can try configure --help=recursive to show all the subdirectories configure options. Al -- http://lists.linuxfromsc

Re: [lfs-dev] Has i686 support dropped in (B)LFS?

2018-01-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 31/01/2018 19:55, Thomas Trepl wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2018, 19:16 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie: >> You may want to try adding two flags to binutils' configure: >> --enable-64-bit-bfd >> --enable-targets=x86-64 > > --enable-targets=x86_64 results in a configure error but the --enable

Re: [lfs-dev] Has i686 support dropped in (B)LFS?

2018-01-31 Thread Thomas Trepl
Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2018, 19:16 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie: > On 31/01/2018 18:57, Thomas Trepl wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2018, 18:48 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie: > > > On 31/01/2018 18:16, thomas wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > does (B)LFS "officially" support i686 platform

Re: [lfs-dev] Has i686 support dropped in (B)LFS?

2018-01-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 31/01/2018 18:57, Thomas Trepl wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2018, 18:48 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie: >> On 31/01/2018 18:16, thomas wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> does (B)LFS "officially" support i686 platforms or did we silently >>> drop >>> 32-bit? There were a few comments about this questio

Re: [lfs-dev] Has i686 support dropped in (B)LFS?

2018-01-31 Thread Thomas Trepl
Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2018, 18:48 +0100 schrieb Pierre Labastie: > On 31/01/2018 18:16, thomas wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > does (B)LFS "officially" support i686 platforms or did we silently > > drop > > 32-bit? There were a few comments about this question in Sept/Oct > > last year as > > Bruce br

Re: [lfs-dev] Has i686 support dropped in (B)LFS?

2018-01-31 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 31/01/2018 18:16, thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > does (B)LFS "officially" support i686 platforms or did we silently drop > 32-bit? There were a few comments about this question in Sept/Oct last year as > Bruce brought this up. I cannot find a final decision. > > I ask this question because of the

[lfs-dev] Has i686 support dropped in (B)LFS?

2018-01-31 Thread thomas
Hi all, does (B)LFS "officially" support i686 platforms or did we silently drop 32-bit? There were a few comments about this question in Sept/Oct last year as Bruce brought this up. I cannot find a final decision. I ask this question because of the issue occured by upgrading binutils to 2.30