Re: [lfs-dev] e2fsprogs + crond

2019-05-12 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 10:25:34PM +0200, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: > Hi all, > > i just started a build of a new system. To my surprise, it failed in > chap6 at e2fsprogs where it never stopped before. > The reason for stopping is > > > ake[1]: Leaving directory '/autolfs/sources/e2fsprog

Re: [lfs-dev] e2fsprogs + crond

2019-05-12 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 5/12/19 3:25 PM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: Hi all, i just started a build of a new system. To my surprise, it failed in chap6 at e2fsprogs where it never stopped before. The reason for stopping is ake[1]: Leaving directory '/autolfs/sources/e2fsprogs-1.45.0/build/po' making install in

[lfs-dev] e2fsprogs + crond

2019-05-12 Thread Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev
Hi all, i just started a build of a new system. To my surprise, it failed in chap6 at e2fsprogs where it never stopped before. The reason for stopping is ake[1]: Leaving directory '/autolfs/sources/e2fsprogs-1.45.0/build/po' making install in scrub make[1]: Entering directory '/autolfs/sources/e

Re: [lfs-dev] Am I supposed to set some CFLAGS to build LFS ?

2019-05-12 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 02:42:47PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > In autotools configure script, if CFLAGS is not set, the script defaults to > use > "-O2 -g" or something the package author set. However, if it is set (for some > packages, *even if set to nothing*, i. e. CFLAGS=""), the

Re: [lfs-dev] Am I supposed to set some CFLAGS to build LFS ?

2019-05-12 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 10:24:19AM +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > On 12/05/2019 06:24, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > Got through chapter 5 ok, time was not a lot greater but the space > > used by /tools was a lot bigger (2.4 GB instead of 851MB). But in > > chapter 6 glibc wa

Re: [lfs-dev] Am I supposed to set some CFLAGS to build LFS ?

2019-05-12 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 5/12/19 1:42 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: On 2019-05-12 05:24 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: As people probably know, I usually set my own CFLAGS when building LFS (at a minimum, -O2 to get rid of most debug symbols). Me too. But I'm now trying to compare the build times and the

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd: hardcoded path in units leads to error

2019-05-12 Thread Richard Melville via lfs-dev
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 22:50, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev < lfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > On 5/10/19 3:12 PM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > On 10/05/2019 14:33, Douglas R. Reno via lfs-dev wrote: > >> > >> On 5/10/19 2:21 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> >

Re: [lfs-dev] Am I supposed to set some CFLAGS to build LFS ?

2019-05-12 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On 12/05/2019 06:24, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > As people probably know, I usually set my own CFLAGS when building > LFS (at a minimum, -O2 to get rid of most debug symbols). But I'm > now trying to compare the build times and the size of the > executables for "I did it my way" against using

Re: [lfs-dev] Am I supposed to set some CFLAGS to build LFS ?

2019-05-12 Thread Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
On 2019-05-12 05:24 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > As people probably know, I usually set my own CFLAGS when building > LFS (at a minimum, -O2 to get rid of most debug symbols). Me too. > But I'm now trying to compare the build times and the size of the > executables for "I did it my way"