On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 00:07, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> Is what we have really that confusing?
In that few people ever read the Dependencies Appendix then, probably not.
I did: I saw some LFS packages listed as "Optional dependencies".
Then Ken said "no packages in LFS are optional"
Bu
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:00:53AM +0900, Akira Urushibata via lfs-dev wrote:
> Kevin Buckley wrote:
>
> > 1) Use of the term "GPL Ghostscript" in the LFS Book
>
> > In the BLFS Book, the package section title is just
> > "ghostscript-9.27", with a lower-case "g" and no "GPL",
> > and although th
Kevin Buckley wrote:
> 1) Use of the term "GPL Ghostscript" in the LFS Book
> In the BLFS Book, the package section title is just
> "ghostscript-9.27", with a lower-case "g" and no "GPL",
> and although the term "GPL Ghostscript" is used within
> the section, there's no note as to why it's referr
On 10/8/19 2:25 AM, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 10:18, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 09:32:17AM +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
To that end though, a couple of other, related, RFCs
1)
Within the LFS Book's "Optional dependencies" li
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 10:18, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 09:32:17AM +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > To that end though, a couple of other, related, RFCs
> >
> > 1)
> > Within the LFS Book's "Optional dependencies" lists, there are a
> > number of refer
