Re: [lfs-dev] Considering zstd

2020-01-10 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 09:53:57PM +0200, Αγαθοκλής via lfs-dev wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, at 05:43 Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:01:48PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > I do agree that we could classify this as 'might be needed in {,B}LFS one > > > d

Re: [lfs-dev] Considering zstd

2020-01-10 Thread Αγαθοκλής via lfs-dev
On Thu, Jan 09, at 05:43 Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:01:48PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > I do agree that we could classify this as 'might be needed in {,B}LFS one > > day', but I am anticipating what I think upstream will do. I just don't > > know

Re: [lfs-dev] Considering zstd

2020-01-10 Thread Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 10:06, Douglas R. Reno via lfs-dev wrote: > > > On 1/8/20 3:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > > I've been seeing some references to zstd lately. AFAIK, the only use > > of it right now in LFS/BLFS is for some tests, but I think it will > > become more common in the fut