Re: [lfs-dev] e2fsprog depends optionally on udev

2020-04-03 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 13:27 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > On 4/3/20 12:33 PM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > I've reinstated the ICA system in jhalfs, in order to test the > > builds > > with the sysroot/cross-compile system. > > > > For those who haven't folowed lfs in the 200x

Re: [lfs-dev] e2fsprog depends optionally on udev

2020-04-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 4/3/20 12:33 PM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: I've reinstated the ICA system in jhalfs, in order to test the builds with the sysroot/cross-compile system. For those who haven't folowed lfs in the 200x years, ICA (iterative comparison analysis) is a way to rebuild the system with itself,

Re: [blfs-dev] dhcpcd-9.0.0 privilege separation: what uid shall be used

2020-04-03 Thread Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
On 4/3/20 7:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 4/3/20 2:56 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote: Hi all I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an important change: it does privilege separation now. This means that an unprivileged user has to be created and that

Re: [lfs-dev] e2fsprog depends optionally on udev

2020-04-03 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:33:08PM +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > I've reinstated the ICA system in jhalfs, in order to test the builds > with the sysroot/cross-compile system. > > For those who haven't folowed lfs in the 200x years, ICA (iterative > comparison analysis) is a way to r

[lfs-dev] e2fsprog depends optionally on udev

2020-04-03 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
I've reinstated the ICA system in jhalfs, in order to test the builds with the sysroot/cross-compile system. For those who haven't folowed lfs in the 200x years, ICA (iterative comparison analysis) is a way to rebuild the system with itself, and compare the results. There used to be another system