On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 08:59, Kevin Buckley wrote:
> ...
> All this time, and I had assumed that LFS had extended the Schema/DTD
> so as to use certain attributes that appeared specific to LFS.
>
> Cheers for pointing that out: I'll "make other plans" !
>
> Kevin
Since then, Bruce has written
> S
On 10/6/20 7:59 PM, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 20:03, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
Where should such a declaration go?
The attribute has to be declared in the dtd (document type definition),
where anything pertaining to the xml document is declared (not on
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 20:03, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> >
> > Where should such a declaration go?
>
> The attribute has to be declared in the dtd (document type definition),
> where anything pertaining to the xml document is declared (not only
> attributes, but also tags and their cont
Am Dienstag, den 06.10.2020, 18:48 +0800 schrieb Kevin Buckley via
lfs-dev:
> i was experimenting with making use of an extra attribute in the
> XML source tags, akin to the vanilla book's 'sysv' or 'systemd'
> for the "revision" attribute,, or to Thomas's Multilib arch attribute
> ('ml_32', 'ml_
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 18:48 +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
> i was experimenting with making use of an extra attribute in the
> XML source tags, akin to the vanilla book's 'sysv' or 'systemd'
> for the "revision" attribute,, or to Thomas's Multilib arch attribute
> ('ml_32', 'ml_x32' or
i was experimenting with making use of an extra attribute in the
XML source tags, akin to the vanilla book's 'sysv' or 'systemd'
for the "revision" attribute,, or to Thomas's Multilib arch attribute
('ml_32', 'ml_x32' or 'ml_all').
When i come to render my source, having added an extra
stringpar
